From owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk  Sun Apr 29 07:18:58 2001
Return-Path: <owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FFB17A78
	for <biophys-outgoing>; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 07:18:57 +0100 (BST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71B917B45
	for <biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 07:18:55 +0100 (BST)
Received: from niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (niobium [193.62.192.41])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B91F17A78
	for <biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 07:18:52 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from news@localhost)
	by niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.8.8) id HAA02216
	for biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 07:18:52 +0100 (BST)
X-Authentication-Warning: niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk: news set sender to <news> using -f
Message-ID: <3AEBB489.259646ED@mediaone.net>
From: George Hammond <ghammond@mediaone.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Newsgroups: alt.agnosticism,alt.astronomy,alt.atheism,alt.athiesm,alt.sci.natural.phenomena.unusual,alt.sci.physics,alt.talk.creationism,bionet.biophysics,harvard.course.physics11a.q-a,sci.bio.paleontology,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,talk.atheism
Subject: Re: The "Science" of John Boatwright
References: <3ae7e476_2@news01.one.net.au> <3AE81A39.DCB403E7@mediaone.net> <3AE84A63.91AF7B61@ozone.ch> <3AE879D7.DE3494E1@mediaone.net> <3ae8b06a.109420557@nntp.we.mediaone.net> <3AE8B9E2.A73DB51B@mediaone.net> <3aea778a.225949493@nntp.we.mediaone.net> <3AEAE234.25CE74E3@mediaone.net> <3aeaee9f.256439876@nntp.we.mediaone.net> <3AEB1D6A.29553686@mediaone.net> <3aeb6f46.289379532@nntp.we.mediaone.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 42
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 06:18:35 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse@mediaone.net
Organization: Road Runner
To: biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Sender: owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Von Bailey wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 19:33:54 GMT, George Hammond
> <ghammond@mediaone.net> wrote:
> 
> >Von Bailey wrote:
> >>
> >
> >>
> >> Did god peer review your work?
> >
> >[Hammond]
> >No, 4 university reviewers of Professorial rank reviewed
> >it and unanimously recommended it for publication in
> >a prestigious international peer reviewed academic
> >journal published by Pergamon Press:
> >
> >HAMMOND G.E. (1994), The Cartesian Theory,
> >             New Ideas In Psychology,
> >             Vol 12(2), pp 153-167
> >             Pergamon Press
> >
> >Note: for your reading ease and luxury a courtesy
> >online facsimile copy of the paper is located at:
> >http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/cart.html
> >   (illustrated)
> 
> Then it was published as a THEORY as opposed to PROOF as you assert.
> If you need a discussion on the difference between the two words have
> it with a dictionary.

[Hammond]
whaddau a twit? or a fairy?

>
-- 
BE SURE TO VISIT MY WEBSITE, BELOW:
-----------------------------------------------------------
George Hammond, M.S. Physics
Email:    ghammond@mediaone.net
Website:  http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html
-----------------------------------------------------------


.