From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Sat Nov 28 22:00:00 1998 Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!btnet-peer!btnet!dispose.news.demon.net!demon!news.demon.co.uk!demon!naturesway.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail From: "Andrew K Fletcher" Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics,bionet.microbiology,bionet.neuroscience Subject: Re: The truth is out there Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 23:17:08 -0000 Organization: OASIS Concepts Ltd Message-ID: <912381406.6676.0.nnrp-04.d4e44203@news.demon.co.uk> References: <73sh3s$1n2$2@news.tamu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: naturesway.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: naturesway.demon.co.uk:212.228.66.3 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 912381406 nnrp-04:6676 NO-IDENT naturesway.demon.co.uk:212.228.66.3 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Lines: 32 Xref: biosci bionet.biophysics:4597 bionet.microbiology:15198 bionet.neuroscience:26114 I have tried to take current explanations into account before continuing and I am glad that you have come forward to offer further data into discussion. Please feel free to point out anything you feel we may have missed with regards to circulation how people are supposed to think in order to become scientists? I believe you have touched upon the very reason for such a prolonged existence of many erroneous scientific projections the world was once thought to be flat by a like minded thinkers. I look forward to your contributions to this discussion. Andrew K Fletcher Walter Eric Johnson wrote in message <73sh3s$1n2$2@news.tamu.edu>... >Andrew K Fletcher (andrew.k.fletcher@naturesway.demon.co.uk) wrote: >: A good lawyer discredits previous evidences and then lays down his new >: evidences on turned soil so they grow free of weeds and competition. > >If you approach science as if it were law, noone is going to >take you seriously. No reputable scientist would use the same >approach as any lawyer. > >In science, the evidence that doesn't fit the theory helps >show the need for extending the theory or coming up with a new >theory. If you just ignore the evidence that is contrary to >your theory, you're no scientist. > >Eric Johnson .