From owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk  Sat Apr 28 22:15:15 2001
Return-Path: <owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD0417B30
	for <biophys-outgoing>; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 22:15:13 +0100 (BST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3B117B31
	for <biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 22:15:11 +0100 (BST)
Received: from niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (niobium [193.62.192.41])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5B117B30
	for <biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 22:15:08 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from news@localhost)
	by niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.8.8) id WAA00459
	for biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 22:15:07 +0100 (BST)
X-Authentication-Warning: niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk: news set sender to <news> using -f
Message-ID: <3AEB2F30.616A68B7@yahoo.com>
From: Eric Gill <ericvgill@yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Newsgroups: alt.agnosticism,alt.astronomy,alt.atheism,alt.athiesm,alt.sci.natural.phenomena.unusual,alt.sci.physics,alt.talk.creationism,bionet.biophysics,harvard.course.physics11a.q-a,sci.bio.paleontology,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,talk.atheism
Subject: Re: The "Science" of John Boatwright
References: <3ae7e476_2@news01.one.net.au> <3AE81A39.DCB403E7@mediaone.net> <3AE84A63.91AF7B61@ozone.ch> <3AE879D7.DE3494E1@mediaone.net> <3ae8b06a.109420557@nntp.we.mediaone.net> <3AE8B9E2.A73DB51B@mediaone.net> <270420012209215335%pww@mac.com> <3AEAE0F5.EEA3DEF8@mediaone.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 39
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 20:59:29 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com
Organization: Road Runner - Texas
To: biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Sender: owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> Peter Walker wrote:
> >
> > In article <3AE8B9E2.A73DB51B@mediaone.net>, George Hammond
> > <ghammond@mediaone.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >[Hammond]
> > >You aren't scientifically qualifed to repair automobiles
> > >much less evaluate a scientific proof of God based on
> > >Factor Analysis and Relativity.  You're a pile of puke,
> > >nevermind garbage.
> >
> > Would you accept the opinion of a Ph.D. physicist that you're a nutbar,
> > since you so proudly proclaim your Master's, thinking, apparently, that
> > a title grants authority?
> >
> > Somehow, considering that you're cross-posting this to a number of
> > Physics groups, I expect you've already been told this by others more
> > qualified than yourself, and since you're still posting, it's safe to
> > conclude that titles of academic authority only mean something to you
> > when they're yours.
> >
> > <plonk>
> 
> [Hammond]
> Look Medieval drag queen, I HAVE NO "academic superiors" when
> it comes to this topic, because:
> 
>             I AM THE ONLY SCIENTIST ON EARTH WHO POSSESSES
>             AN EXPERTISE IN PSYCHOMETRY AND RELATIVITY AT
>             THE SAME TIME.

So there! Nyah!

Ah, the messiah complex. Well, at least your web page isn't as ugly as
Dore Williamson's.

<snip>


.