From owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk  Sat Apr 28 21:43:40 2001
Return-Path: <owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7627317AB5
	for <biophys-outgoing>; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 21:43:39 +0100 (BST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC14417B2E
	for <biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 21:43:35 +0100 (BST)
Received: from niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (niobium [193.62.192.41])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D7917B2D
	for <biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 21:43:32 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from news@localhost)
	by niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.8.8) id VAA00027
	for biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 21:43:31 +0100 (BST)
X-Authentication-Warning: niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk: news set sender to <news> using -f
Message-ID: <3AEB27CD.3790BEA0@yahoo.com>
From: Eric Gill <ericvgill@yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Newsgroups: alt.agnosticism,alt.astronomy,alt.atheism,alt.athiesm,alt.sci.natural.phenomena.unusual,alt.sci.physics,alt.talk.creationism,bionet.biophysics,harvard.course.physics11a.q-a,sci.bio.paleontology,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,talk.atheism
Subject: Re: The "Science" of John Boatwright
References: <3ae7e476_2@news01.one.net.au> <3AE81A39.DCB403E7@mediaone.net> <3AE84A63.91AF7B61@ozone.ch> <3AE879D7.DE3494E1@mediaone.net> <3ae8b06a.109420557@nntp.we.mediaone.net> <3AE8B9E2.A73DB51B@mediaone.net> <3aea778a.225949493@nntp.we.mediaone.net> <3AEAE234.25CE74E3@mediaone.net> <3aeaee9f.256439876@nntp.we.mediaone.net> <3AEB1D6A.29553686@mediaone.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 34
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 20:28:00 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com
Organization: Road Runner - Texas
To: biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Sender: owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> Von Bailey wrote:
> >
> 
> >
> > Did god peer review your work?
> 
> [Hammond]
> No, 4 university reviewers of Professorial rank reviewed
> it and unanimously recommended it for publication in
> a prestigious international peer reviewed academic
> journal published by Pergamon Press:
> 
> HAMMOND G.E. (1994), The Cartesian Theory,
>              New Ideas In Psychology,
>              Vol 12(2), pp 153-167
>              Pergamon Press

And this contained your god theory?

If not, when do you plan to submit it for peer review?

> Note: for your reading ease and luxury a courtesy
> online facsimile copy of the paper is located at:
> http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/cart.html
>    (illustrated)
> 
> Now if you don't have something to say with factual
> scientific content..... why don't you take a hike.
> You're boring the shit out of everybody and wasting
> bandwidth with your tape recorded academic tripe.

Hmmm...why don't you take your own advice?


.