From owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Sat Apr 28 20:24:20 2001 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F5D17AA4 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 20:24:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46F717B05 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 20:24:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (niobium [193.62.192.41]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEA617AA4 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 20:24:14 +0100 (BST) Received: (from news@localhost) by niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.8.8) id UAA20187 for biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 20:24:13 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk: news set sender to using -f Message-ID: <3AEB1B0F.5D8C32D3@mediaone.net> From: George Hammond X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Newsgroups: alt.agnosticism,alt.astronomy,alt.atheism,alt.athiesm,alt.sci.natural.phenomena.unusual,alt.sci.physics,alt.talk.creationism,bionet.biophysics,harvard.course.physics11a.q-a,sci.bio.paleontology,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,talk.atheism Subject: Re: The "Science" of John Boatwright References: <3ae7e476_2@news01.one.net.au> <3AE81A39.DCB403E7@mediaone.net> <3AE84A63.91AF7B61@ozone.ch> <3AE879D7.DE3494E1@mediaone.net> <3ae8b06a.109420557@nntp.we.mediaone.net> <3AE8B9E2.A73DB51B@mediaone.net> <1127_988344536@GANDALF> <3AE9B280.8406B3B2@mediaone.net> <3AEADE18.6CDCEC04@mediaone.net> <3aeafab8.259537105@nntp.we.mediaone.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 55 Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 19:23:51 GMT X-Complaints-To: abuse@mediaone.net Organization: Road Runner To: biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Sender: owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Von Bailey wrote: > > On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 15:03:46 GMT, George Hammond > wrote: > > >Eros wrote: > >> > >> > >> > > > > I went to the web site to. It's garbage > >> and unless you already assume there is a god it proves nothing. > >> > > > > >> > > > [Hammond] > >> > > > You aren't scientifically qualifed to repair automobiles > >> > > > much less evaluate a scientific proof of God based on > >> > > > Factor Analysis and Relativity. You're a pile of puke, > >> > > > nevermind garbage. > >> > > > >> > > Nice ad hominems and insults George. What part of the scientific method > >> > > are you applying here? > >> > > >> > [Hammond] > >> > Moral superiority, General intelligence, human experience > >> > and greater learning. In short, a knowledge of the scientific > >> > explanation of God. > >> > >> Really! I'm glad you said "general" intelligence. Since you are so learned > >> and experienced in this so-called "knowledge of the scientific explanation > >> of God", perhaps you'll be able to answer this simple question;- > >> Without refering to the Bible, what is the single most compelling piece of > >> evidence that DIRECTLY supports the hypothesis of Divine Creation? > > > >[Hammond] > >No problem: > >The fact that if all men died tomorrow the Universe > >as we know it, would cease to exist. > > > Did you ever consider the fact that there were no 'men' at the time of > the dinosaur and granting this (if of course you do) did the universe > exist then? [Hammond] The "world as Dinosaurs knew it" existed. To them God looked like a Dinosaur. In fact the Dinosaur Bible said "God created Dinosaur in his image, and he also created the fowls of the air, and the fish of the Sea, and the creeping things of the earth". -- BE SURE TO VISIT MY WEBSITE, BELOW: ----------------------------------------------------------- George Hammond, M.S. Physics Email: ghammond@mediaone.net Website: http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html ----------------------------------------------------------- .