From owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Sat Apr 28 03:09:34 2001 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C9A17A7C for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 03:09:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875BF17A5C for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 03:09:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (niobium [193.62.192.41]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C6C17A7C for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 03:09:28 +0100 (BST) Received: (from news@localhost) by niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.8.8) id DAA09253 for biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 03:09:27 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk: news set sender to using -f From: Peter Walker X-Newsgroups: alt.agnosticism,alt.astronomy,alt.atheism,alt.athiesm,alt.sci.natural.phenomena.unusual,alt.sci.physics,alt.talk.creationism,bionet.biophysics,harvard.course.physics11a.q-a,sci.bio.paleontology,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,talk.atheism Subject: Re: The "Science" of John Boatwright Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 22:09:21 -0400 Lines: 25 Message-ID: <270420012209215335%pww@mac.com> References: <3ae7e476_2@news01.one.net.au> <3AE81A39.DCB403E7@mediaone.net> <3AE84A63.91AF7B61@ozone.ch> <3AE879D7.DE3494E1@mediaone.net> <3ae8b06a.109420557@nntp.we.mediaone.net> <3AE8B9E2.A73DB51B@mediaone.net> Reply-To: pww@mac.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Orig-Path: pww Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: YA-NewsWatcher/4.2.3 To: biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Sender: owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Precedence: bulk In article <3AE8B9E2.A73DB51B@mediaone.net>, George Hammond wrote: > >[Hammond] >You aren't scientifically qualifed to repair automobiles >much less evaluate a scientific proof of God based on >Factor Analysis and Relativity. You're a pile of puke, >nevermind garbage. Would you accept the opinion of a Ph.D. physicist that you're a nutbar, since you so proudly proclaim your Master's, thinking, apparently, that a title grants authority? Somehow, considering that you're cross-posting this to a number of Physics groups, I expect you've already been told this by others more qualified than yourself, and since you're still posting, it's safe to conclude that titles of academic authority only mean something to you when they're yours. -- Dr. Peter Wykoff Walker II | WWW: http://spacsun.rice.edu/~pww BAAWA Master Squire | alt.atheist #3 (Oldtimer Division) --------- QUI NOS RODUNT CONFUNDANTUR ET CUM IUSTIS NON SCRIBANTUR --------- .