From owner-comp-bio@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk  Wed Jan 16 03:01:54 2002
Return-Path: <owner-comp-bio@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334EE17B6E
	for <comp-bio-outgoing>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 03:01:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F354B17B70
	for <comp-bio-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 03:01:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix, from userid 6023)
	id DFE6617B60; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 03:01:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A89117B17
	for <bionet-biology-computational@net.bio.net>; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:51:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mr1.ash.ops.us.uu.net (mr1.ash.ops.us.uu.net [198.5.241.86])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EAF17A56
	for <bionet-biology-computational@net.bio.net>; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:51:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk by mr1.ash.ops.us.uu.net with ESMTP 
	(peer crosschecked as: chiark.greenend.org.uk [212.22.195.2])
	id QQlxxj05888
	for <bionet-biology-computational@uunet.uu.net>; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:51:06 GMT
Received: from news by chiark.greenend.org.uk with local (Exim 3.12 #2)
	id 16QT3R-0003qn-00 (Debian); Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:51:05 +0000
To: bionet-biology-computational@uunet.uu.net
From: Tim Cutts <timc@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.biology.computational
Subject: Re: Rasmol in c++
Organization: Linux Unlimited
Message-ID: <VCo*TLqep@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
References: <zWg08.20186$cU4.686020@twister1.libero.it>
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test70 (17 January 1999)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 03:01:39 +0000 (GMT)
Sender: owner-comp-bio@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

In article <zWg08.20186$cU4.686020@twister1.libero.it>,
francesco <barbierifrancesco@wappi.com> wrote:
>Hello!
>Can i find rasmol in c++ source code?where? i find only c code on the net!!!

I thought Rasmol was indeed written in C.  If that's the case, you won't
find any C++ code for it anywhere.  Being pedantic of cours, if it's
valid ANSI C, it will compile on a C++ compiler, and so could be said to
be C++ source.  :-)

Why do you want specifically C++ code anyway?

Tim.


.