From owner-drosophila@net.bio.net Sun Jun 20 23:00:00 1993
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!woodchuck.bio.indiana.edu!jlogsdon
From: jlogsdon@bio.indiana.edu (John Logsdon)
Newsgroups: bionet.drosophila
Subject: Re: Non-Consensus Splicing??
Message-ID: <C8zDCF.1q5@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
Date: 21 Jun 93 16:48:15 GMT
References: <3449@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu>
Sender: news@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: Department of Biology / Indiana University
Lines: 25
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A84B51FEB901E03A@woodchuck.bio.indiana.edu>
X-Xxdate: Mon, 21 Jun 93 06:54:38 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host: woodchuck.bio.indiana.edu
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d20

In article <3449@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> Victoria Finnerty,
vmfinne@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu writes:
>eukaryotic splicing signals?  I am interested in a discussion of
non-consensus
>signals in particular.

Try the following two papers on for size:

Mount, S.M. et al. (1992) Splicing signals in Drosophila: intron size,
information content, and consensus sequences.  Nucleic Acids Res. v 20:
pp 4255-4262.

Jackson, I.J. (1991) A reappraisal of non-consensus mRNA splice sites.
Nucleic Acids Res. v 19: pp 3794-3798.

John
___________________________________________________________
John Logsdon         Department of Biology
                     Indiana University
                     Bloomington, IN  47405
                     (812) 855-2549
                     (812) 855-6705 fax

jlogsdon@bio.indiana.edu
____________________________________________________________

.