From owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk  Sun May  6 01:43:54 2001
Return-Path: <owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B866117B2C
	for <biophys-outgoing>; Sun,  6 May 2001 01:43:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997AB17B28
	for <biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>; Sun,  6 May 2001 01:43:51 +0100 (BST)
Received: from niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (niobium [193.62.192.41])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F330717B1E
	for <biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>; Sun,  6 May 2001 01:43:47 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from news@localhost)
	by niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.8.8) id BAA03432
	for biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk; Sun, 6 May 2001 01:43:47 +0100 (BST)
X-Authentication-Warning: niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk: news set sender to <news> using -f
Message-ID: <3AF49AA9.33C3C56A@yahoo.com>
From: Eric Gill <ericvgill@yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.talk.creationism,sci.physics,alt.sci.physics,bionet.biophysics,harvard.course.physics11a.q-a,sci.bio.paleontology,talk.atheism
Subject: Re: The "Science" of John Boatwright
References: <1130_988815720@GANDALF> <3AF075C8.85701AD4@mediaone.net> <1103_988859806@GANDALF> <3AF1E700.461CE5C3@mediaone.net> <3AF218BA.CEEE1AA1@yahoo.com> <050520011825580664%pww@mac.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
Date: Sun, 06 May 2001 00:28:05 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com
Organization: Road Runner - Texas
To: biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Sender: owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Peter Walker wrote:
> 
> In article <3AF218BA.CEEE1AA1@yahoo.com>, Eric Gill
> <ericvgill@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> >George Hammond wrote:
> >>
> >> Gromit wrote:
> >>
> >> snip
> >>
> >> >
> >> > I like it here. Why annoy physicists with our discussion?
> >>
> >> [Hammond]
> >> Who's "we"?  I AM A PHYSICIST!
> >
> >And a net.loon, first and foremost.
> >
> >> Which brings up the matter of why
> >> you're trying to "annoy a physicist with your questions"?
> >
> >Yo, Peter- has Gromit been annoying you?
> 
> Gromit? No, not at all. I think you're mixing him up with Hammond, who
> is a simple loon.

Well, no. Hammond is apparently awarding himself the title of
"physicist" and implying that he's annoyed.

<shrug> You'd think he'd be used to the heckling by now.


.