From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Mon Nov 23 22:00:00 1998 Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!howland.erols.net!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!not-for-mail From: "Dane Myers" Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics,bionet.microbiology,bionet.neuroscience Subject: Re: Testability and Hypotheses, Dane et al Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 18:37:45 -0800 Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA Lines: 7 Message-ID: <73d64v$8g0$1@usc.edu> References: <721spg$cr7$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36449D67.378533CC@pop3.concentric.net> <36449FE2.313F8F3@pop3.concentric.net> <36477CA4.D2FED10@pop3.concentric.net> <3647B373.953F0A70@pop3.concentric.net> <3649B0AF.E720E242@psci.net> <364AAB63.C5056FB9@pop3.concentric.net> <364B5C6D.75E14B08@indiana.edu> <72s7c5$1mt@apple.telalink.net> <36532160.4995D522@indiana.edu> <73b09n$9r8$1@usc.edu> <3659B800.AD2F4594@indiana.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-223-128.usc.edu X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Xref: biosci bionet.biophysics:4566 bionet.microbiology:15124 bionet.neuroscience:25930 Because you so skillfully dodged anything relating to my point, and I would like to hear you rebut as opposed to support my point (as you did in that meager attempt at a reply), I'll repost my question... >>Now tell me again why testability must predicate science? .