From owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk  Thu May  3 04:16:25 2001
Return-Path: <owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36E817A91
	for <biophys-outgoing>; Thu,  3 May 2001 04:16:23 +0100 (BST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A0317A96
	for <biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>; Thu,  3 May 2001 04:16:21 +0100 (BST)
Received: from niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (niobium [193.62.192.41])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA1D17A91
	for <biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>; Thu,  3 May 2001 04:16:18 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from news@localhost)
	by niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.8.8) id EAA21983
	for biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk; Thu, 3 May 2001 04:16:17 +0100 (BST)
X-Authentication-Warning: niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk: news set sender to <news> using -f
From: Gromit <mvp54609@qwest.net>
X-Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.talk.creationism,sci.physics,alt.sci.physics,bionet.biophysics,harvard.course.physics11a.q-a,sci.bio.paleontology,talk.atheism
Subject: Re: The "Science" of John Boatwright
Message-ID: <1103_988859806@GANDALF>
References: ( <1130_988815720@GANDALF> <3AF075C8.85701AD4@mediaone.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows NT 5.0) Opera 5.02  [en]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii";
Lines: 39
Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 03:16:46 GMT
To: biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Sender: owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 02 May 2001 20:53:12 GMT, George Hammond <ghammond@mediaone.net> wrote:
> Gromit wrote:
> 
> snip
> 
snip
> > > [Hammond]
> > > The result is significant at the p=.001 level.  If you don't
> > > know what that means, then you're not qualified to ask the
> > > question.
> > 
> > More ad hominems my dear 'scientist' friend? Could you explain how you reached these
> > conclusions?
> 
> [Hammond]
> OK, Gromit.... I'll cut a deal with you.  There's a new thread
> crossposted by me to:
> 
> sci.physics
> alt.sci.physics
> alt.sci.physics.new-theories
> 
> entitled:
> 
>         A FACTOR ANALYTIC proof of God
> 
> No one is going to respond to it because they are so goddamned jealous.

Non sequitur. They might also not respond due to the content of your posting,
your ad hominem 'rebuttals'?

>  So, as it seems you are a logical scientific thinker with some bona fide
> (if elementary) questions, if you will be so kind as to
> post your specific questions to me on that new thread.... I will grant you
> my undivided attention, and meticulously answer all of your questions.
> Deal?

I like it here. Why annoy physicists with our discussion?


.