From owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk  Mon Dec  9 21:54:46 2002
Return-Path: <owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D9ED7D1B5
	for <biophys-outgoing>; Mon,  9 Dec 2002 21:54:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DCA7D145
	for <biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>; Mon,  9 Dec 2002 21:54:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (niobium [193.62.192.41])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1B47D1B5
	for <biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>; Mon,  9 Dec 2002 21:54:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: (from news@localhost)
	by niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.8.8) id VAA15873
	for biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 21:54:43 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning: niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk: news set sender to <news> using -f
From: brian.legros@epfl.ch ("Brian Le Gros")
X-Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Collagen birefringence
Date: 9 Dec 2002 21:54:42 -0000
Organization: BIOSCI/MRC Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <000a01c29fcd$ce0b6300$e792b280@lmafpc160.sti.intranet.epfl.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: news@net.bio.net
X-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA577D1B5
	for <biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>; Mon,  9 Dec 2002 21:54:41 +0000 (GMT)
X-Received: from mail0.epfl.ch (mail0.epfl.ch [128.178.50.57])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 33F7B7D166
	for <biophys@net.bio.net>; Mon,  9 Dec 2002 21:54:40 +0000 (GMT)
X-Received: (qmail 8966 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2002 21:54:40 -0000
X-Received: from icappc160.epfl.ch (HELO lmafpc160) (128.178.146.231)
  by mail0.epfl.ch with SMTP; 9 Dec 2002 21:54:40 -0000
X-To: <biophys@net.bio.net>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
X-Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700
To: biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Sender: owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Dear List Members,

My questions are in regards to quantitative polarized light microscopy.  I
am trying to determine the absolute retardation of a cortical bone sample
and as such I need to know the difference between the fast and slow
refraction indices of the component collagen fibres (type I).  The best
references I have at the moment suggest that the difference between the two
(the actual birefringence Bmax) is approximately 0.001.  Is this correct?
Is it possible that anyone can state the specific difference between the
refraction indices of collagen fibres or direct me to any more definitive
references?

Many thanks,

Brian Le Gros,
Laboratory of Bone Biomechanics,
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne,
LBOS-BIOE-FSTI
CH-1015 Lausanne
Tél: ++41 21 693 3874
Fax: ++41 21 693 3509


---

.