From owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Wed Jul 25 23:23:10 2001 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744BB17B8E for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 23:23:09 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AAB517CFE for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 23:23:04 +0100 (BST) Received: from niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (niobium [193.62.192.41]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1635317AA9 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 23:22:57 +0100 (BST) Received: (from news@localhost) by niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.8.8) id XAA12114 for biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 23:22:19 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk: news set sender to using -f Reply-To: "JT" From: "JT" X-Newsgroups: alt.sports.soccer.manchester.united.scum-haters,bionet.biophysics References: <2ketltcf5122bamsg1q7inkf4fkdaqadhk@4ax.com> <9jn6q8$c04$1@newsreaderm1.core.theplanet.net> <9jnffd$apgp$1@ID-91117.news.dfncis.de> Subject: Re: Dear !Jones Lines: 114 Organization: Scum-Haters X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 23:21:50 +0100 X-Complaints-To: abuse@clara.net To: biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Sender: owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Precedence: bulk "peace" wrote in message news:9jnffd$apgp$1@ID-91117.news.dfncis.de... > > Virgin Mary wrote in message > news:yMG77.6892$ar1.23132@www.newsranger.com... > > In article , Bowers says... > > > > > >On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 20:39:59 +0100, "Fester" wrote: > > > > > >> > > >>Bowers wrote in message > > >>news:mr4ultclqv15lhm0996016fmtkhvfugfp2@4ax.com... > > >>> On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 12:52:52 -0500, !Jones > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> >On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 07:28:47 -0500, Stefan Walker > > >>> > wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> >>Dear !Jones; > > >>> >> > > >>> >>In biology class, we learned that male semen is really millions > > >of > > >>> >>tiny skummies swimming furiously upstream to find the egg (you > > >>> >know... > > >>> >>the old "birds and the bees" thing). Anyway, my question is: > > >when I > > >>> >>jerk off, how come it just sits there in a puddle? How come it > > >>> >>doesn't swim away? > > >>> >> > > >>> >>Curious > > >>> > > > >>> >Dear Curious; > > >>> > > > >>> >You have to view a puddle of cum as a physical "system" and > > >analyze > > >>> >it's behavior from that paradigm. You see, all of those little > > >>> >skummies are swimming in random directions and, thus, tend to > > >cancel > > >>> >each other out. The puddle of semen cannot possibly move unless > > >they > > >>> >can be trained to act in unison. > > >>> > > > >>> >Jones > > >>> > > >>> The point you're both missing is the locus of the sperm's motion. > > >>> It's analogous to suggesting that, if all of the fish in a lake > > >would > > >>> suddenly swim in the same direction, the lake would move; it would > > >>> not. An individual sperm cell in the puddle of semen exerts a > > >force > > >>> opposite and equal to its forward acceleration... thus each sperm > > >>> cancels its own motion with respect to the greater system; i.e. the > > >>> puddle of cum. > > >>> > > >>> D. Bowers, Ph.D. > > >> > > >>How exactly does one measure the performance of sperm and then get > > >around to > > >>comparing that performance with the molecular structure and > > >performance of > > >>water? > > >> > > >>Surely the best method would be to fill one blokes testicles with > > >real sperm > > >>and the other with water and see which of the two contenders manages > > >to > > >>fertilize the egg first? > > >> > > >>As for sperm moving in random directions ... that's crap, they can > > >all spot > > >>the chance of a swim in the furry goblet so they all go the same way, > > >hence > > >>providing the man's testicles with a swinging forward motion. > > >Obviously if > > >>the fish in a lake all moved at once the lake would move as the fish > > >would > > >>displace more water if they all went in to a smaller area, granted > > >the > > >>ammount changed would be minimal but the fish would cause the water > > >to > > >>move!!! > > >> > > >>Phil Macavity. STD. > > > > > >Well, you're right and wrong at the same time, young fellow; you see, > > >once a bloke has wiped his knob on the beef curtains, the sperm are in > > >a liquid environment. It's more akin to dumping a bucket of guppies > > >into the ocean. The fish move about. of course, but the ocean stays > > >put. > > > > > >D. Bowers, Ph.D. > > > > Dear Dr. Ph.d and Dr. STD, > > > > I have a bad problem, I had cybersex for the first time. > > I think I may be having Steves baby. Is this possible, he > > said he was cumming in me? > > > > Virgin Mary > > No he said he was cumming in May > > Err... > > Bye No don't go.... we'll give peace a chance...... I'll get me coat... Neo .