From owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk  Tue May  1 00:41:00 2001
Return-Path: <owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B5D17A64
	for <biophys-outgoing>; Tue,  1 May 2001 00:40:59 +0100 (BST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B21717A76
	for <biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>; Tue,  1 May 2001 00:40:57 +0100 (BST)
Received: from niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (niobium [193.62.192.41])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9ADC17A64
	for <biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>; Tue,  1 May 2001 00:40:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from news@localhost)
	by niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.8.8) id AAA18722
	for biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk; Tue, 1 May 2001 00:40:53 +0100 (BST)
X-Authentication-Warning: niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk: news set sender to <news> using -f
Message-ID: <3AEDF825.54D23CA0@hvc.rr.com>
From: Bob Moss <rmoss@hvc.rr.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.athiesm,alt.sci.physics,alt.talk.creationism,bionet.biophysics,harvard.course.physics11a.q-a,sci.bio.paleontology,sci.physics,talk.atheism
Subject: Re: The "Science" of John Boatwright
References: <3AE9B280.8406B3B2@mediaone.net> <nIrG6.842$VM5.31890@ozemail.com.au> <3AEADE18.6CDCEC04@mediaone.net> <3aeafab8.259537105@nntp.we.mediaone.net> <3AEB1B0F.5D8C32D3@mediaone.net> <Pine.WNT.4.21.0104291756160.201-100000@WS-B207-07.warwick.ac.uk> <3AEC8193.FA637652@mediaone.net> <3AEC80E6.B2458DB@hvc.rr.com> <3AEC975E.37157E09@mediaone.net> <3AECB09B.83C68B85@mindspring.com> <3AED2DAD.810FE326@mediaone.net> <1103_988647178@GANDALF> <3AED9F76.CDE10BD6@mediaone.net> <vqbretsofevs7vegfbfga5ja8shljd4cis@4ax.com> <3AEDE686.D491671E@mediaone.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 28
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 23:38:46 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse@hvc.rr.com
Organization: Time Warner Road Runner - Liberty NY
To: biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Sender: owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk



George Hammond wrote:
> 
> David Jensen wrote:
> snip
> 
> > >[Hammond]
> > >There are no fallicies.  Don't be an idiot, I'm a graduate physicist,
> > >I know what a scientific proof is and what it isn't...
> >
> > What's a scientific proof, I've never heard of that before.
> 
> [Hammond]
> 
>                   Definition of a Scientific Proof
>                            (Hammond)
> 
>          A scientific proof consists of a comprehensive,
>          internally consistent theoretical explanation
>          derivable from the axiomatic "Laws of Physics",
>          and which, in addition, is overwhelmingly confirmed
>          by direct experimental evidence.


Of course, anybody who knew anything about science knows you can't 
"PROVE" any theory. YOu can only disprove it. This demonstrates that
not only you are an arrogant,delusional idiot, you are also ignorant


.