Subj : Re: This Train Just Went Splat! To : alt.tv.er From : Dropping The Helicopter Date : Sun Sep 25 2005 17:36:52 From Newsgroup: alt.tv.er npardue@indiana.edu wrote: > MauiJNP wrote: >>>> As noted, when allowed to make the decision, MOST babies wean >>>> somewhere around 2 or 3 ... not 6 or 35. >>> All three of my boys weened themselves at about 14 - 16 months of age - >>> not by my choice, but by theirs. My first heart break of "they're growing >>> up so quickly!". >>> >> its the people that don't accept this fact and force the breastfeeding that >> bother me. > > What fact? That babies sometimes wean themselves? Since you can't > force a child to breastfeed, it should be pretty obvious. > > my cousin's wife insisted that her child needed to be breastfed >> till she was 4 because she was such a lousy eater and wouldn't be healthy >> otherwise. also she said that the child cried and wanted the breast. >> however, whenever the kid was in the same room as solid foods she would dive >> for them and her mom would take it all away and force the child to breastfed >> (which she would sometimes fight). > > Sounds like your cousin's wife had some weird problems. Yep. Industrial strength, case-harded, large-bore problems. Nothing "natural" or "fine" or "not at all wrong and sick" about it at all. > IF she wasn't > aware that children over 6-12 months also need solid foods she was > poorly educated about parenting -- something that has nothing to do > with breatsfeeding in and of itself. (Where was the pediatrician when > all this was happening?) ALso, probably the reason the child was such a > 'lousy eater' is that she wasn't getting ANYTHING to eat. You can't > force a child to nurse, This mother was. What do you figure the percentage of 6-year-olds that are still breastfeeding are also being forced is? > so if she refused to let the kid have solids > AND the child really didn't want to nurse, the child wouldn't have had > much of anything to eat. > AND if he got hungry enough, he'd suck the teat. > Naomi > .