Subj : Re: Thoughts about threads in C++
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Jomu
Date : Mon May 02 2005 01:36 am


Maciej Sobczak wrote:
....
> >   This is so improvisation and too-much-information and
> > what-is-this-for that it hurts my eyes - really.
>
> So welcome to C++. :)
>
> VAR i : INTEGER;
> VAR m : MUTEX;
>
> PROCEDURE p;
> BEGIN
>      LOCK m DO
>          i := 7;
>      END;
> END;
>
> This is so [...] that it hurst my eyes - really. ;)

  1st, you don't know how to write it, so don't bother :).

  2nd, it's not more information than needed, no extra "local" object,
is structured, and there is a point.

>
> But let's not flame about different languages. My point is to have
> something that is already known and recognizable to the C++
community.

  Then use something recognizable to threading community, and it's
certainly "procedure is a body".

  This thread had outlived it's usefulness too long ago. It's good
these news readers have those filters or people would be falling dead
until now :).

  Good luck with your project.

  dd

.