Subj : usb, technicalities, and
To   : Scott Little
From : Lee Aroner
Date : Thu Jun 08 2000 02:45 pm

SL> peltiers are still uneconomical; they are toys for geeks. a 
  > stable filesystem is hardly just a toy for geeks. if IBM 
  > has the technology (they do) they should implement it 
  > wherever suitable (all recent versions of OS/2 of any 
  > flavour), not only wherever they can extract the most money 
  > (server only).

SL> and before you say it, implementing NTFS into Win9x would require a LOT of 
  > low level changes. significantly more than adding an IFS to 
  > a client flavour of OS/2.


   That's called: superior design.


                                       LRA


 -- SPEED 2.01 #2720: What is another word for "Thesaurus"?

--- Maximus/2 3.01
 * Origin: Top Hat 2 BBS (1:343/41)

.