COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No. 82814 ROBERT L. PINKAVA : ORIGINAL ACTION : : JOURNAL ENTRY Petitioner : AND : OPINION vs. : : THOMAS POKORNY, COURT OF : COMMON PLEAS, CUYAHOGA COUNTY : : Respondent : DATE OF JOURNALIZATION: JULY 8, 2003 CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: WRIT OF PROCEDENDO JUDGMENT: Writ Denied. Motion No. 350040. APPEARANCES: For Petitioner: ROBERT L. PINKAVA, pro se Inmate No. A155-820 PCC 10E1 65 P.O. Box 209 Orient, Ohio 43146 For Respondent: WILLIAM D. MASON, ESQ. Cuyahoga County Prosecutor BY: RENEE L. SNOW, ESQ. Assistant County Prosecutor Justice Center - 9th Floor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 -2- CELEBREZZE, FRANK D., JR., J. Robert L. Pinkava, the petitioner, has filed a complaint for a writ of procedendo. Pinkava seeks an order from this court which requires Judge Thomas Pokorny, the respondent, to render a ruling with regard to a "motion to vacate guilty plea," as filed on or about November 7, 2001 in the underlying action of State v. Pinkava, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-4423. Judge Pokorny has filed a motion for summary judgment, which we grant for the following reasons. Attached to Judge Pokorny's motion for summary judgment is a copy of a judgment entry, as journalized on March 29, 2002, which denied Pinkava's "motion to vacate guilty plea." Pinkava 's complaint for a writ of procedendo is thus moot. State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163; State ex rel. Jerningham v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 658 N.E.2d 723. In addition, we find that Pinkava's complaint for a writ of mandamus is defective since it is improperly captioned. A petition for a writ of procedendo must be brought in the name of the state, on relation of the person applying. The failure of Pinkava to properly caption his complaint for a writ of procedendo warrants dismissal. Cf. Allen v. Court of Common Pleas of Allen Cty. (1962), 173 Ohio St. 226, 181 N.E.2d 270; Dunning v. Judge Cleary, et al. (Jan. 11, 2001), Cuyahoga App. No. 78763. -3- Pinkava has also failed to support his complaint with an affidavit "specifying the details of the claim, " as required by Loc.App.R. 45(B)(1)(a). State ex rel. Wilson v. Calabrese (Jan. 18, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No. 70077; State ex rel. Smith v. McMonagle (July 17, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No. 70899. Finally, Pinkava has failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25, which requires an affidavit that describes each civil action or appeal filed by the relator within the previous five years in any state or federal court. Pinkava 's failure to comply with R.C. 2969.25 warrants the dismissal of his complaint for a writ of mandamus. State ex rel. Zanders v. Ohio Parole Board , 82 Ohio St.3d 421, 1998-Ohio-218, 696 N.E.2d 594; Alford v. Winters , 80 Ohio St.3d 285, 1997-Ohio-117, 685 N.E.2d 1242. Accordingly, we grant Judge Pokorny's motion for summary judgment. Costs to Pinkava. It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Eighth District Court of Appeals serve upon all parties notice of this judgment as required by Civ.R. 58(B). Writ denied. FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR. JUDGE KENNETH A. ROCCO, P.J., AND ANN DYKE, J., CONCUR. .