COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 79766 STATE OF OHIO, : ACCELERATED : Plaintiff-Appellee : : JOURNAL ENTRY vs. : AND : OPINION LARRY ROBINSON, : : Defendant-Appellant : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION : MAY 2, 2002 CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: : Criminal appeal from : Common Pleas Court : Case No. CR-405088 JUDGMENT : AFFIRMED. DATE OF JOURNALIZATION : APPEARANCES: For plaintiff-appellee: William D. Mason, Esq. Cuyahoga County Prosecutor BY: John J. Gallagher, Esq. Assistant County Prosecutor The Justice Center 8th Floor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 For defendant-appellant: Myron P. Watson, Esq. 113 St. Clair Building 113 St. Clair Avenue, East Suite 440 Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1214 -2- MICHAEL J. CORRIGAN, J.: {q1} This case came to be heard upon the accelerated calendar pursuant to App.R. 11.1 and Loc.R. 11.1, the record from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas and briefs of the parties. The court denied defendant Larry Robinson's motion to suppress fifty-one rocks of crack cocaine found in his car during an inventory of his vehicle. The police conducted the inventory after they stopped Robinson for speeding and arrested him for driving while under a license suspension. {q2} The court found that Robinson had been speeding as a basis for the traffic stop, and credible evidence supported this determination. We must defer to this factual finding. See State v. Keene (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 646, 656. {q3} The court likewise relied on credible evidence to approve the Cleveland Police inventory of the contents of the vehicle. See State v. Cook (2001), 143 Ohio App.3d 386. Although Robinson argued that his passenger could have driven the vehicle away, he failed to present any credible evidence whatsoever to support this argument, particularly since the passenger had been arrested for a drug law violation as well. {q4} Finally, competent credible evidence supported the court's factual determination that the police were entitled to search Robinson for weapons after they observed him making furtive gestures beneath the seat of his car after being stopped. See State v. Lozado (2000), 92 Ohio St.3d 74, paragraph one of the syllabus. In any event, the search would have been lawful as a -3- consequence of Robinson's valid arrest for driving while under a license suspension. See State v. Murrell (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 489, syllabus. Judgment affirmed. -4- It is ordered that appellee recover of appellant its costs herein taxed. The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal. It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the Common Pleas Court to carry this judgment into execution. The defendant's conviction having been affirmed, any bail pending appeal is terminated. Case remanded to the trial court for execution of sentence. A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. MICHAEL J. CORRIGAN JUDGE TIMOTHY E. McMONAGLE, A.J., CONCURS IN JUDGMENT ONLY. JAMES D. SWEENEY, J., CONCURS IN JUDGMENT ONLY. N.B. This entry is an announcement of the court's decision. See App.R. 22(B), 22(D) and 26(A); Loc.App.R. 27. This decision will be journalized and will become the judgment and order of the court pursuant to App.R.22(E) unless a motion for reconsideration with supporting brief, per App.R. 26(A), is filed within ten (10) days of the announcement of the court's decision. The time period for review by the Supreme Court of Ohio shall begin to run upon the journalization of this court's announcement of decision by the clerk per App.R. 22(E). See, also, S.Ct.Prac.R. II, Section 2(A)(1). .