COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT
                       COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
                            NO. 79073
MARY CLARE CONNOLE                 :
                                   :     ACCELERATED DOCKET
   Plaintiff-Appellee              :
                                   :        JOURNAL ENTRY
     -vs-                          :
                                   :             AND
JAMES PATRICK CONNOLE, ET AL.      :
                                   :           OPINION
   Defendant                       :
                                   :
[APPEAL BY: US COMMUNICATIONS      :
 AND ELECTRIC, INC.                :
                                   :
   Defendant-Appellant]            :
Date of Announcement
  of Decision:                     MAY 24, 2001
Character of Proceeding:           Civil appeal from Court
                                   of Common Pleas Domestic
                                   Relations Division Case
                                   No. D-275601
Judgment:                          Appeal dismissed.
Date of Journalization:
Appearances:
For Plaintiff-Appellee:            BRIAN M. URBAN, ESQ.
                                   BRIDGETTE P. WINKLER, ESQ.
                                   600 Standard Building
                                   1370 Ontario Street
                                   Cleveland, Ohio 44113-1752
                                   [continued on next page]
For Defendant-Appellant            MARK L. RODIO, ESQ.
US Communications and              Thompson, Hine & Flory, L.L.P.
Electric, Inc.:                    3900 Key Center
                                   127 Public Square
                                   Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1216
                               -2-
JAMES J. SWEENEY, J.:
     This  case is  dismissed  sua sponte  for  lack of  a  final
appealable  order pursuant  to R.C.  2505.02.   First, the  trial
court's January  3, 2001  order requiring  US Communications  and
Electric, Inc. to provide responses to Mrs. Connole's request for
production of documents  is not a  provisional remedy within  the
meaning of R.C 2505.02(A)(3) because the requests do not pertain to
 privileged  matter.   Mr.  Connole's claim that the  information
sought is privileged because it constitutes trade secrets is  not
supported by the definition of a trade secret in R.C. 1333.61(D).
     Thus,  the  order  is  not final,  and  this  court  has  no
jurisdiction over the appeal.   The motion to dismiss the  appeal
filed by Mrs. Connole is granted.
     Appeal dismissed.
                               -3-
     It is ordered  that appellee recover of appellant her  costs
herein taxed.
     It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this Court
directing the Court of Common Plea Domestic Relations Division to
carry this judgment into execution.
     A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the  mandate
pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
DIANE KARPINSKI, A.J., and
KENNETH A. ROCCO, J., CONCUR.
                                      JAMES J. SWEENEY
                                           JUDGE
N.B. This entry is an announcement of the court's decision.   See
App.R. 22(B), 22(D) and 26(A); Loc.App.R. 22.  This decision will
be journalized and will become the judgment and order of the court
pursuant to App.R. 22(E) unless a motion for reconsideration with
supporting brief, per App.R. 26(A), is filed within ten (10) days
of the announcement of the court's decision.  The time period for
review by the Supreme Court of  Ohio shall begin to run upon  the
journalization of  this court's announcement  of decision by  the
clerk per  App.R. 22(E).   See, also,  S.Ct.Prac.R. 112,  Section
2(A)(1).
 
.