COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 78163 CITY OF UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS : : ACCELERATED DOCKET Plaintiff-Appellee : : JOURNAL ENTRY -vs- : : AND EDMUND W. ROTHSCHILD : : OPINION Defendant-Appellant : : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION: MARCH 8, 2001 CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Criminal appeal from Lyndhurst Municipal Court Case No. 99 TRD 12261 JUDGMENT: Vacated. DATE OF JOURNALIZATION: APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff-Appellee: IRL RUBIN City of Lyndhurst Prosecutor 35401 Euclid Avenue, #101 Willoughby, Ohio 44094 For Defendant-Appellant: DENNIS P. LEVIN, ESQ. Park Center II - Suite 410 3681 Green Road Cleveland, Ohio 44122-5716 -2- PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J.: This case originated in University Heights. However, the University Heights judge recused and asked the common pleas court's administrative judge to assign the case to a different municipality. The administrative judge, upon the voluntary disqualification by the University Heights judge, transferred the case to the Lyndhurst Municipal Court. The Lyndhurst trial judge dismissed appellant Edmund Rothschild's traffic violation and assessed the cost to him. He appeals the cost assessment. However, our first concern is jurisdictional. Historically, this court has held that an administrative judge of common pleas court on a trial judge's voluntary disqualification application is without authority to transfer or reassign a case unless specifically authorized by statute. See Bedford v. Lacey (1985), 30 Ohio App.3d 1, 506 N.E.2d 224. We recently followed Bedford v. Hughes in City of Rocky River v. Hughes (2000), Ohio App.Lexis 5462, (November 22, 2000), Cuyahoga App. No. 76771, unreported. There, we held only the chief justice of the Supreme Court of Ohio may reassign a case on a judge's voluntary disqualification from a case. Id. Consequently, we vacate the Lyndhurst Municipal Court's decision. Judgment vacated. This cause is vacated. -3- It is, therefore, considered that said appellant recover of said appellee his costs herein. It is ordered that a special mandate be sent to said court to carry this judgment into execution. A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. DIANE KARPINSKI, A.J., and ANNE L. KILBANE, J., CONCUR. PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON JUDGE N.B. This entry is an announcement of the court's decision. See App.R. 22(B), 22(D) and 26(A); Loc.App.R. 22. This decision will be journalized and will become the judgment and order of the court pursuant to App.R. 22(E) unless a motion for reconsideration with supporting brief, per App.R. 26(A), is filed within ten (10) days of the announcement of the court's decision. The time period for review by the Supreme Court of Ohio shall begin to run upon the journalization of this court's announcement of decision by the clerk per App.R. 22(E). See, also, S.Ct.Prac.R. II, Section 2(A)(1). .