COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 78392 STATE OF OHIO ex rel. : VICTOR HARTNESS : : PETITION FOR WRIT OF Relator : MANDAMUS : vs. : MOTION NO. 21182 : DANIEL GAUL, JUDGE : JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO : : Respondent : JUDGMENT : WRIT DENIED. DATE OF JOURNALIZATION : SEPTEMBER 27, 2000 APPEARANCES: For relator : VICTOR HARTNESS, pro se #312-129 Trumbull Correctional Institution Post Office Box 901 5701 Burnett Road Leavittsburg, Ohio 44430 For respondent : WILLIAM D. MASON Cuyahoga County Prosecutor RENO J. ORADINI, JR. Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Justice Center, Courts Tower 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 -2- ANN DYKE, A.J.: Victor Hartness, relator, is seeking a writ of mandamus to compel respondents, Judge Daniel Gaul and Gerald Fuerst, "to execute proper service upon him of a judgement (sic) entry rendered on January 12, 2000, in reference to State of Ohio -vs- Victor Hartness, CR-323-640." Relator alleges that the clerk of court failed to serve him with a copy of the judgment entry in his postconviction proceeding and that he has been prevented from filing a timely appeal. The state filed a motion for summary judgment1 and, for the reasons that follow, we grant respondent's motion. A writ of mandamus will not be issued when a relator has or had an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law to seek the relief sought. R.C. 2731.05; State ex rel. Matheis v. Russo (1990), 50 Ohio St.3d 204, 553 N.E.2d 653. Relator has an adequate remedy through the use of a Civ.R. 60(B)(5) motion for relief from judgment to demonstrate his alleged lack of proper service which resulted in his inability to perfect a timely appeal. State ex rel. Smith v. Fuerst (Feb. 10, 2000), Cuyahoga App. No. 77325, unreported, affirmed (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 456, 732 N.E.2d 983; see State v. Fuller (July 13, 2000), Cuyahoga App. No. 76448, unreported. Accordingly, respondent's motion for summary judgment is granted. 1The state claimed the issue was moot based upon the exhibits attached to the complaint. Relator's exhibits, however, do not demonstrate compliance with Civ.R. 58(B). -3- Writ denied. Costs assessed against relator. Clerk of court to serve notice upon all parties as provided in Civ.R. 58(B). TERRENCE O'DONNELL,J. CONCURS ANN DYKE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE .