COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 77747 IN RE: WILLIAM EFFORD : A MINOR : ACCELERATED DOCKET : : JOURNAL ENTRY : : AND : : OPINION : : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION: OCTOBER 12, 2000 CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Civil appeal from Juvenile Court Division Common Pleas Court Case No. 9912424 JUDGMENT: Dismissed. DATE OF JOURNALIZATION: APPEARANCES: For Appellee: WILLIAM D. MASON Cuyahoga County Prosecutor EDWARD O. FITZGERALD STEVEN E. GALL Assistant Prosecutors 8th Floor Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 For Appellant: WILLIE L. GRIFFIN, ESQ. 861 East 143rd Street Cleveland, Ohio 44110-3513 PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J.: -2- Sua sponte, this appeal is dismissed for failure to timely file a transcript of the lower court proceedings. See App.R. 11(C). Absent a transcript, this court is unable to properly evaluate appellant's assignments of error. Appellant has the duty to ensure that the record or any portions thereof that are necessary to determine the appeal are filed with the reviewing court. State v. Gibson (Feb. 8, 2000), Richland App. No. 99-CA-59, unreported, citing Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. Adams (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 17, 19, 520 N.E.2d 564, 565-566. See, also, State v. Render (1975), 43 Ohio St.2d 17, 21, 330 N.E.2d 690, 693, citing Ford v. Ideal Aluminum (1966), 7 Ohio St.2d 9, 13, 218 N.E.2d 434, 436; Crow v. Brite Metal Treating (1967), 9 Ohio St.2d 63, 64, 223 N.E.2d 595,596. The law in Ohio is clear that, where an authenticated transcript of proceedings in a trial court is necessary to exemplify the facts which determined the issues presented there, its absence requires a reviewing court, upon appeal, to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment of the court from which the appeal is taken. Judgment is dismissed. This appeal is dismissed. It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant its costs herein taxed. A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rule of Appellate Procedure. TERRENCE O'DONNELL, P.J., and MICHAEL J. CORRIGAN, J., CONCUR. PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON JUDGE N.B. This entry is an announcement of the court's decision. See App.R. 22(B), 22(D) and 26(A); Loc.App.R. 22. This decision will be journalized and will become the judgment and order of the court pursuant to App.R. 22(E) unless a motion for reconsideration with supporting brief, per App.R. 26(A), is filed within ten (10) days of the announcement of the court's decision. The time period for review by the Supreme Court of Ohio shall begin to run upon the journalization of this court's announcement of decision by the clerk per App.R. 22(E). See, also, S.Ct.Prac.R. II, Section 2(A)(1). .