COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT
                       COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
                           NO. 76886
STATE OF OHIO, EX REL.        :    PETITION FOR WRIT OF
ALONZO HARDY                  :    MANDAMUS
                              :
               Relator        :    MOTION NO. 14387
                              :
          vs.                 :    JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
                              :
RICHARD J. MCMONAGLE, JUDGE   :
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS         :
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO         :
                              :
               Respondent     :
                              :
DATE OF JOURNALIZATION   :    MARCH 2, 2000
JUDGMENT                 :    WRIT DENIED.
APPEARANCES:
For Relator              :    ALONZO HARDY, Pro Se
                              No. 365-262
                              Mansfield Correctional Institution
                              P. O. Box 788
                              Mansfield, Ohio 44901
For Respondent           :    WILLIAM D. MASON,
                                Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
                              GAIL D. BAKER, Assistant
                              Justice Center, Courts Tower
                              1200 Ontario Street
                              Cleveland, Ohio 44113
ANN DYKE, A.J.:
     On September 1, 1999,  the relator, Alonzo Hardy,  commenced
                               -2-
this mandamus  action against  the respondent,  Judge Richard  J.
McMonagle, to compel the judge to issue a journal entry specifying
the number  of days of jail credit to which he is entitled.   Mr.
Hardy maintains that he is entitled to fifty-nine days of jail time
credit and that he filed a motion for such credit in October 1998,
in the underlying case,  State of Ohio v. Alonzo Hardy,  Cuyahoga
County Common Pleas Court  Case No. CR-365921.  On September  30,
1999, the respondent through the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor, moved
for summary judgment on the grounds of mootness.    However,  the
order attached to that motion did not specify the number of days of
credit; it  only ordered the sheriff  to calculate the number  of
days.  This court denied that motion.
     On January 11, 2000, the respondent again moved for  summary
judgment on the grounds of mootness.  Attached to this motion was
a copy of a certified, signed journal entry, file stamped October
8,  1999, in  which the  trial judge  stated that  Mr. Hardy  was
entitled to sixty days of jail time credit.  Mr. Hardy did not file
a response.   The respondent has  established that Mr. Hardy  has
received his requested relief, an entry stating the number of days
of jail time credit.  Thus, this mandamus action is moot.
     Additionally, the relator failed to support his complaint with
an affidavit  specifying the details of the claim  as required by
Local Rule 45(B)(1)(a).  State ex rel. Wilson v. Calabrese  (Jan.
18, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No. 70077, unreported; and State ex rel.
Smith  v. McMonagle  (July 17,  1996), Cuyahoga  App. No.  70899,
unreported.
                               -3-
     Accordingly, the court  grants the  respondent's motion  for
summary judgment and denies the writ.  Costs assessed against the
relator.
.