COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 74304 STATE OF OHIO : ACCELERATED DOCKET : Plaintiff-Appellee : JOURNAL ENTRY : -vs- : and : RONALD JONES : OPINION : Defendant-Appellant : PER CURIAM : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OCTOBER 22, 1998 OF DECISION: CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Criminal appeal from Common Pleas Court Case No. CR-329824 JUDGMENT: Affirmed. DATE OF JOURNALIZATION: APPEARANCE: For Plaintiff-Appellee: STEPHANIE TUBBS JONES, ESQ. Cuyahoga County Prosecutor CHRISTOPHER L. FREY, ESQ. Assistant County Prosecutor 8TH Floor Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 For Defendant-Appellant: THOMAS G. KELLY, ESQ. 516 Standard Building 1370 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 -2- PER CURIAM: Appellant Ronald Jones appeals his three (3) to fifteen (15) year sentence for felonious assault. Jones was sentenced on July 16, 1996 and now argues he should have been sentenced under Senate Bill 2, which was effective July 1, 1996, and which established the new penalty for felonious assault as two, three, four, five, six, seven or eight years. He assigns the following error for our review: THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED PLAIN ERROR WHEN THEY [sic] SENTENCED THE DEFENDANT BASED ON THE SENTENCING LAW IN EFFECT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 1996, FOR AN OFFENSE COMMITTED BEFORE JULY 1, 1996, INSTEAD OF THE NEW LAW WHICH TOOK EFFECT ON JULY 1, 1996. After reviewing the record and arguments of the parties, we affirm the trial court's decision in light of the Ohio Supreme Court's recent decision in State v. Rush (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 53. Appellant pleaded guilty to felonious assault and was sentenced to three (3) to fifteen (15) years in prison on July 16, 1996. Appellant maintains that the trial court should have given him the option of being sentenced under Senate Bill 2, which became effective on July 1, 1996 and changed indefinite sentences for felonies to definite terms of imprisonment. Additionally, he argues the sentencing was improper in light of our decision in State v. Dempsey (Nov. 20, 1997), Cuyahoga App. No. 71479, unreported. In Dempsey, this court held that a defendant in such a situation is entitled to the benefit of the claimed lesser penalty -3- set forth in the new law. However, the Ohio Supreme Court reached a different conclusion in Rush. Because the General Assembly has expressly stated the amended sentencing provisions of Am.Sub.S.B. No. 2 are applicable only to those crimes committed on or after its effective date, R.C. 1.58(B) is inapplicable. The amended sentencing provisions of Am.Sub.S.B. No. 2 apply only to those crimes committed on or after July 1, 1996. Rush at 58. Accordingly, appellant's sole assignment of error is overruled. Judgment affirmed. It is ordered that appellee recover of appellant its costs herein taxed. The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal. It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the Common Pleas Court to carry this judgment into execution. The defendant's conviction having been affirmed, any bail pending appeal is terminated. Case remanded to the trial court for execution of sentence. A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE ANN DYKE, JUDGE DIANE KARPINSKI, JUDGE N.B. This entry is an announcement of the court's decision. See App.R. 22(B), 22(D) and 26(A); Loc.App.R. 27. This decision will be journalized and will become the judgment and order of the court pursuant to App.R. 22(E) unless a motion for reconsideration with supporting brief, per App.R. 26(A), is filed within ten (10) days of the announcement of the court's decision. The time period for review by the Supreme Court of Ohio shall begin to run upon the journalization of this court's announcement of decision by the .