COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 74114 STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. : PETITION FOR WRIT OF JEROME REED, SR. : HABEAS CORPUS : Relator : MOTION NO. 92894 : vs. : JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION : GERALD T. MCFAUL, SHERIFF : : Respondent : : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION : APRIL 2, 1998 JUDGMENT : WRIT DISMISSED. DATE OF JOURNALIZATION : APPEARANCES: For Relator : JEROME REED, SR., Pro Se P. O. Box 5600 Cleveland, Ohio 44101 For Respondent : STEPHANIE TUBBS-JONES Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Justice Center, Courts Tower 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 -2- PATRICIA A. BLACKMON, A.J.: On March 11, 1998, the petitioner, Jerome Reed, filed a Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus and a complaint in habeas corpus. He alleges that he was arrested on February 20, 1998, by the Brooklyn Police, and on February 24, 1998, he was transferred to the Cuyahoga County jail under the supervision of Respondent, Gerald McFaul, by order of the Parma Municipal Court. He then complains that he is being unlawfully deprived of his freedom, because the Ohio Adult Parole Authority has failed to hold the mandatory hearing within the required time pursuant to R.C. 2967.15. Sua sponte, this court dismisses this writ action for the following reasons. First, Mr. Reed has failed to attach a copy of the commitment or cause of detention as required by R.C. 2725.04(D). State ex rel. Wynn v. McFaul (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 193 and Workman v. Shiplevy (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 174, 685 N.E.2d 231. Moreover, Mr. Reed has failed to verify his complaint or attach an affidavit specifying the details of his claim as required by R.C. 2725.04(A) and Local Appellate Rule 8(B)(1). State ex rel. Ranzy v. Coyle (1988), 81 Ohio St.3d 109 and State ex rel. Wilson v. Calabrese (Jan. 18, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No. 70077, unreported. To the extent that Mr. Reed is endeavoring to commence his writ action by filing a motion for writ of habeas corpus, such device is inadequate to the task and is fatally defective. State ex rel. Simms v. Sutula (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 110. Moreover, Mr. Reed's claim concerning the required parole -3- revocation is premature and insufficiently pled. Seebeck v. Zent (1993), 68 Ohio St.3d 109, 623 N.E.2d 1195; State ex rel. Taylor (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 121, 609 N.E.2d 546 and Coleman v. Stobbs (1986), 23 Ohio St.3d 137, 491 N.E.2d 1126. Accordingly, this habeas corpus action is dismissed. Petitioner to pay costs. JAMES M. PORTER, J., CONCURS. .