COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 72533 : CITY OF CLEVELAND, : ACCELERATED : Plaintiff-Appellee : JOURNAL ENTRY : AND vs. : OPINION : JOSEPH R. ESLICK, : PER CURIAM : Defendant-Appellant : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION : DECEMBER 11, 1997 CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: : Criminal appeal from : Cleveland Municipal Court : Case No. 97-TRD-34763 JUDGMENT : REVERSED. DATE OF JOURNALIZATION : APPEARANCES: For plaintiff-appellee: Richard A. Kray Assistant City Prosecutor 8th Floor Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 For defendant-appellant: David M. Cuppage 9th Floor Halle Building 1228 Euclid Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44115 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant's sole assignment of error reads: APPELLANT'S CONVICTION FOR VIOLATION OF CLEVELAND CITY ORDINANCE SECTION 439.12(b) IS NOT SUPPORTED WITH SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE. Cleveland Codified Ordinances 439.12(b) reads in part: 439.12 Shifting Load; Loose Loads *** (b) No motor vehicle or trailer shall be driven unless the tailboard or tailgate, tarpaulins, chains (except ground or contact chains), ropes, stakes, poles, and the like, or any part of the load, are securely fastened to prevent dangling, flapping, swinging or falling from the side, end or top of the load or body. All projecting cargo shall be properly guarded by a red flag or cloth or a red light of lantern as required by Section 437.08. In a criminal case, the prosecution must prove each and every element of the crime charged. State v. Jenks (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 259. The elements of a crime are determined wholly by statute. State v. Draggo (1981), 65 Ohio St.2d 88, 91. Cleveland Codified Ordinances 439.12(b) requires equipment such as a tailgate to be secured. In this case, appellant did not violate the ordinance as his trailer did not have a tailgate. Accordingly, the prosecution could not prove appellant violated Cleveland Codified Ordinances 439.12(b). Appellant's assignment of error is well taken and his conviction is reversed. This cause is reversed for proceedings consistent with this opinion. 3 It is, therefore, considered that said appellant recover of said appellee his costs herein. It is ordered that a special mandate be sent to said court to carry this judgment into execution. A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. PATRICIA A. BLACKMON, PRESIDING JUDGE JOSEPH J. NAHRA, JUDGE JOHN T. PATTON, JUDGE N.B. This entry is an announcement of the court's decision. See App.R. 22(B), 22(D) and 26(A); Loc.App.R. 27. This decision will be journalized and will become the judgment and order of the court pursuant to App.R.22(E) unless a motion for reconsideration with supporting brief, per App.R. 26(A), is filed within ten (10) days of the announcement of the court's decision. The time period for review by the Supreme Court of Ohio shall begin to run upon the journalization of this court's announcement of decision by the .