COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 72358 STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. : DAVID L. TINO : : Relator : JOURNAL ENTRY : AND vs. : OPINION : JUDGE PEGGY FOLEY JONES : : Respondent : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION : JUNE 12, 1997 CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING : WRIT OF MANDAMUS JUDGMENT : DISMISSED DATE OF JOURNALIZATION : APPEARANCES: For Relator: DAVID L. TINO, Pro Se Inmate No. 291-945 Lorain Correctional Facility 2075 South Avon-Belden Road Grafton, Ohio 44044 For Respondent: STEPHANIE TUBBS JONES Cuyahoga County Prosecutor SHERRY F. McCREARY, Asst. Prosecuting Attorney 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 - 2 - JAMES M. PORTER, J.: David L. Tino, relator, is seeking a writ of mandamus to compel respondent, Judge Peggy Foley Jones, to sua sponte "provide the Relator with 'EQUAL PROTECTION' by adjusting his current sentence imposed under former law, to be consistent with the new sentencing enactment of section 5 of Senate Bill 2, as amended by S.B. 269, effective July 1, 1996 ***." For the following reasons, we sua sponte dismiss the petition. A petition for a writ of mandamus may be dismissed sua sponte if it is obvious that the relator cannot prevail on the facts alleged in the petition. State ex rel. Peeples v. Anderson (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 559, 653 N.E.2d 371; State ex rel. Tran v. Christian (Jan. 29, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No. 70116, unreported. Relator alleged in his petition that his current sentence was imposed under the former law and relator testified in his supporting affidavit that he is incarcerated pursuant to the laws as they existed prior to July 1, 1996. The Supreme Court of Ohio, in the recent case of State ex rel. Lemmon v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 186, has clearly stated that the amended sentencing provisions do not apply to persons convicted and sentenced prior to July 1, 1996. In light of Lemmon, which was decided just one day prior to the institution of this action, it is obvious that relator cannot prevail on his given facts. - 3 - Accordingly, petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed sua sponte. Costs to relator. JAMES D. SWEENEY, C.J., and NAHRA, J., CONCUR. .