COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 72311 STATE OF OHIO, EX REL : CONRAD FERGUSON : PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS : RELATOR : MOTION NOS. 85415 and 85661. : v. : JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : : : RESPONDENT : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION: AUGUST 21, 1997 JUDGMENT: WRIT DISMISSED. DATE OF JOURNALIZATION: APPEARANCES: For Relator: Conrad Ferguson, pro se No. 323-831 Orient Correctional Institution P.O. Box 511 Columbus, OH 43216 For Respondent: Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Esq. Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Lisa Reitz Williamson Assistant County Prosecutor Justice Center - 8th Floor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, OH 44113: SWEENEY, C.J.: 2 On April 10, 1997, the relator, Conrad Ferguson, commenced this mandamus action against the respondent, the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, to compel rulings on several motions for jail time credit which he had filed in the underlying cases, State of Ohio v. Conrad Ferguson, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Case Nos. Cr. 341222 (Case 1) and 337546 (Case 2). The respondent moved for summary judgment and established that the court had granted jail time credit for only Case 1. Thus, this court granted the motion for summary judgment in part and denied it in part and invited the respondent to submit another motion for summary judgment resolving the mandamus claim for Case 2. On July 21, 1997, the respondent again moved for summary judgment, attaching a certified copy of a file-stamped journal entry in Case 2 granting Mr. Ferguson forty-eight days of credit. On July 29, 1997, Mr. Ferguson filed a Request of jail time credit to be granted, in which he asked this court to credit him 99 days directly. Mr. Ferguson attached no affidavits or other evidentiary materials to this motion. Thus, the journal entry, attached to the respondent's dispositive motion, establishes that the respondent has fulfilled its duty to rule on the motion for jail time credit. Any further dispute concerning the amount of credit given would need to be considered through the adequate remedy of appeal. State ex rel. Spates v. Judge James J. Sweeney (Apr. 17, 1997), Cuyahoga App. No. 71986, unreported and State ex rel. Ney v. Niehaus (1987), 33 Ohio St.3d 118, 515 N.E.2d 914. Thus, this mandamus action is moot. The motion for summary 3 judgment is granted, and this writ action is dismissed. Respondent to pay costs. .