COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 71574 STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. : HAROLD DICKEY : Relator : PETITION FOR WRIT OF : MANDAMUS -vs- : : JUDGE FRANK CELEBREZZE, JR. : CUY. CTY. COURT OF COM. PLEAS : Respondent : : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT : OF DECISION : JANUARY 13, 1997 JUDGMENT : DISMISSED. DATE OF JOURNALIZATION : APPEARANCES: For relator: For respondent: Harold Dickey Stephanie Tubbs Jones #314-949 Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Lima Correctional Institu- Randi Ostry LeHoty tion Assistant Prosecuting Attorney P.O. Box 4571 The Justice Center Lima, Ohio 45302 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 - 2 - Relator avers that he is the defendant in State v. Dickey, Cuyahoga Cty. C.P. Case Nos. CR-325453 and 326518. Relator states that he filed a motion for court records without cost on August 28, 1996 in which he requested the "Criminal appearance docket, Indict- ment, Plea Hearing and Sentencing Transcript, Jounal [sic] Entry and Commitment of Sentence ***" in order to permit him to prepare a petition for postconviction relief. Complaint, pars. 2 and 3 (capitalization in original). Relator requests that this court compel respondent judge to provide relator with a transcript of evidence at public expense. Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss (Motion No. 78339). Respondent argues that relator's complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because neither a direct appeal nor a petition for postconviction relief is pending. We agree. In State ex rel. Reeder v. Green (Nov. 12, 1992), Cuyahoga App. No. 64430, unreported, the relator averred that he was indi- gent and that he needed transcripts to prepare and prosecute a petition for postconviction relief. Reeder requested that this court compel the court of common pleas to provide him with a tran- script at state's expense. After citing State ex rel. Murr v. Thierry (1987), 34 Ohio St.3d 45, 517 N.E.2d 226, which held that an appeal or postconviction action must be pending at the time a defendant seeks a transcript, we dismissed Reeder's action in - 3 - mandamus. In this action, relator has averred that he wishes to prepare a petition for postconviction relief. A review of the docket in Case Nos. CR-325453 and 326518 reflects, however, that relator has not filed either a direct appeal or a petition for postconviction relief. As a consequence, respondent's motion to dismiss is well- taken. Additionally, to the extent that relator is requesting that respondent judge provide him with free copies of the transcript and various court filings, mandamus does not lie. State ex rel. Jones v. Court of Common Pleas (July 23, 1992), Cuyahoga App. No. 63585, unreported. In any event, by entries journalized on September 10, 1996, respondent denied relator's motion for court records without cost. Accordingly, respondent's motion to dismiss (Motion No. 78339) is granted. Relator to pay costs. Writ dismissed. PATRICIA A. BLACKMON, JUDGE, CONCURS .