COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NOS. 71025 & 71809 WALTER MANDZUK, : ACCELERATED DOCKET : : JOURNAL ENTRY Plaintiff-Appellee : : AND v. : : OPINION LTV STEEL COMPANY, ET AL., : : PER CURIAM : Defendants-Appellants : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION: JANUARY 30, 1997 CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Civil appeals from Common Pleas Court Case Nos. 303422 and 316153 JUDGMENT: VACATED AND REMANDED. DATE OF JOURNALIZATION: APPEARANCES: For plaintiff-appellee, Paul J. Cristallo Walter Mandzuk: BERGER & KIRSCHENBAUM CO., LPA 1919 East 13th Street Cleveland, Ohio 44114 For appellee, Industrial Sandra Lisowski Commission of Ohio and Bureau Assistant Attorney General of Workers' Compensation: State Office Building 615 W. Superior Avenue 12th Floor Cleveland, Ohio 44113 For defendants-appellants: R. Patrick Baughman Sandra Becher Sommers William J. Krueger BAUGHMAN & ASSOCIATES CO., LPA 55 Public Square, Suite 2215 Cleveland, Ohio 44113-1996 -2- PER CURIAM: These are consolidated cases involving the same workers' compensation matter. In appellate case no. 71025, we overrule appellants' first and second assignments of error. We hold that LTV must employ R.C. 4123.522 in order to invest the trial court with jurisdiction. See Cantrell v. Celotex Corp. (1995), 105 Ohio App.3d 90. Any other holding both obviates the need for R.C. 4123.522 as a "savings procedure" and circumvents the well defined statutory procedures for administrative workers' compensation appeals. Because appellants did not timely appeal, nor exhaust their administrative remedies, the trial court had no subject matter jurisdiction over the lawsuit and properly dismissed the case. We sustain appellants' third assignment of error. Dismissal with prejudice is inappropriate where the trial court lacks jurisdiction. Civ.R. 41(B)(4). Accordingly, we vacate the entry of dismissal with prejudice and remand this cause for entry of dismissal without prejudice. With respect to appellate case no. 71809, having ruled that the first appeal to the common pleas court should have been dismissed without prejudice, the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable as there has been no final judgment on the merits. See Grava v. Parkman Twp. (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 379. Therefore, in case no. 71809, we vacate the trial court's journal entry dismissing the case and remand for further proceedings pursuant to the finding of the Industrial Commission -3- that proper notice of its decision was not received by appellants and the consequent timely appeal filed by appellants in said case no. 71809. -4- This cause is vacated and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is, therefore, considered that said appellants recover of said appellee their costs herein. It is ordered that a special mandate be sent to said court to carry this judgment into execution. A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. PATRICIA A. BLACKMON PRESIDING JUDGE JOSEPH J. NAHRA, JUDGE LEO M. SPELLACY, JUDGE N.B. This entry is an announcement of the court's decision. See App.R. 22(B), 22(D) and 26(A); Loc.App.R. 27. This decision will be journalized and will become the judgment and order of the court pursuant to App.R. 22(E) unless a motion for reconsideration with supporting brief, per App.R. 26(A), is filed within ten (10) days of the announcement of the court's decision. The time period for review by the Supreme Court of Ohio shall begin to run upon the journalization of this court's announcement of decision by the .