COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 70154 STATE OF OHIO, EX REL : ALBERT COLA : Relator : PETITION FOR WRIT OF : HABEAS CORPUS -vs- : : SHERIFF GERALD T. MCFAUL : SHERIFF OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY : : and : : JUDGE PATRICIA J. CLEARY : : Respondents : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT : OF DECISION : FEBRUARY 7, 1996 JUDGMENT : PETITION AND RELIEF GRANTED. DATE OF JOURNALIZATION : APPEARANCES: For relator: For respondent: Phillip A. Lawrence, Esq. Stephanie Tubbs Jones 26 S. Franklin Street Cuyahoga County Prosecutor P.O. Box 226 The Justice Center Chagrin Falls, Ohio 44022 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 - 2 - In his petition for habeas corpus Albert Cola alleges that he is president of a corporation which operates a bar which employees go-go dancers. On March 5, 1995, the police arrested one of the dancers. When it was discovered that the dancer was sixteen years old, Mr. Cola was indicted on December 5, 1995, for violating R.C. 2907.323, "Illegal use of minor in nudity-oriented material or performance", a second degree felony. State of Ohio v. Albert Cola, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Case No. Cr. 331023. Several days later at his arraignment he pleaded not guilty, and he promptly posted the $2,500.00 surety bond. Next, he asserts that he did not receive notice of a pre-trial hearing scheduled for January 9, 1996. On January 16, 1996, he received notice of bond forfeiture and appeared the next day at court for that matter. The trial court imposed a $10,000.00 cash bond. Because Mr. Cola could not produce such funds, he was committed to the county jail. Mr. Cola has now properly commenced this habeas corpus action to contest the propriety of the bond. In Ohio habeas corpus is the appropriate remedy to raise the claim of excessive or inappropriate bail. In re Gentry (1982), 7 Ohio App.3d 143, 454 N.E.2d 987; Jenkins v. Billy (1989), 43 Ohio St.3d 84, 538 N.E.2d 1045. In the present case the $10,000 cash bond is excessive and inappropriate. In State ex rel. Jones v. Hendon (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 115, 609 N.E.2d 541, the Supreme Court of Ohio held that a trial court may not impose the condition of a "cash only" bond on bail. The court reasoned that requiring a "cash only" bond to the - 3 - exclusion of other permitted forms of bond would only serve to restrict an accused's access to a surety and would, thus, detain the person in violation of Section 9, Article I of the Ohio Constitution, which provides in pertinent part that "[a]ll persons shall be bailable by sufficient sureties" in noncapital cases. The court accordingly concluded that the trial court judge's discretion in imposing bond is limited to setting the amount of the bond. Once the amount is set the accused may exercise his constitutional right to enlist a surety to post bail on his behalf. Thus, in the present case, the $10,000 cash only bond is impermissible and as such is vacated by this court. The initial $2,500.00 cash or surety bond revives into effect as the last appropriate bond issued. The trial court, of course, may re-examine the issue of bail and impose any reasonable, appropriate bond pursuant to Crim. R. 46. Accordingly, this court grants Mr. Cola's petition for habeas corpus and grants relief as follows: In State of Ohio v. Albert Cola, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Case No. Cr. 331023 the $10,000.00 cash bond is vacated; the initial $2,500.00 surety bond is in effect, subject to further order of the trial court. Respondent to pay costs. PATRICIA A. BLACKMON, J., and TIMOTHY E. McMONAGLE, J., CONCUR. JAMES D. SWEENEY PRESIDING JUDGE .