COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 70008 STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-appellee : : JOURNAL ENTRY -vs- : AND : OPINION CYRUS E. WILSON : : Defendant-appellant : : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT : AUGUST 29, 1996 OF DECISION : CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING : Criminal appeal from Court of Common Pleas : Case No. CR-305304 JUDGMENT : REVERSED AND REMANDED DATE OF JOURNALIZATION : APPEARANCES: For plaintiff-appellee: For defendant-appellant: EDWARD F. FERAN JOHN DOLATOWSKI, ESQ. Assistant County Prosecutor East Brunswick Professional Justice Center-8th Fl. Bldg. 1200 Ontario Street 3864 Center Road, #A9 Cleveland, OH 44113 Brunswick, OH 44212 - 2 - PATTON, J. Petitioner Cyrus Wilson pleaded guilty to one count of drug abuse. He did not appeal. Petitioner later filed a petition for postconviction relief in which he claimed defense counsel failed to provide him with effective representation. The common pleas court dismissed the petition without making findings of fact and conclusions of law. The first assignment of error relating to the court's failure to make findings of fact and conclusions of law is sustained. The court has a mandatory duty to make such findings if it dismisses the petition. See R.C. 2953.21(C); State v. Lester (1975), 41 Ohio St.2d 51, paragraph two of the syllabus; State v. Riggins (1993), 91 Ohio App.3d 350. Because the trial court did not make the required findings of fact and conclusions of law, we must remand for further proceedings. Judgment reversed and remanded. - 3 - This cause is reversed and remanded to the lower court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is, therefore, considered that said appellant recover of said appellee his costs herein. It is ordered that a special mandate be sent to said court to carry this judgment into execution. A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. LEO M. SPELLACY, C.J. DAVID T. MATIA, .J. CONCUR JUDGE JOHN T. PATTON N.B. This entry is made pursuant to the third sentence of Rule 22(D), Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure. This is an announce- ment of decision (see Rule 26). Ten (10) days from the date hereof, this document will be stamped to indicate journalization, .