COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 68568 IN THE MATTER OF: : CAROLYN WHEAT : : Plaintiff-Appellee : : JOURNAL ENTRY -vs- : AND : OPINION : : Defendant-Appellant : : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION: DECEMBER 5, 1996 CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: CIVIL APPEAL FROM THE JUVENILE COURT DIVISION COMMON PLEAS COURT CASE NO. 9412867 JUDGMENT: APPEAL DISMISSED. DATE OF JOURNALIZATION: APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff-Appellee: VICKI LYNN WARD (#0030905) 1276 WEST THIRD STREET - Suite 100 CLEVELAND, OHIO 44113 For Appellee, Cuyahoga County Department of Children and Family Services: CYNTHIA BOWERS (#0026154) 3955 Euclid Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44115 For Defendant-Appellant: JOHN P. PARKER (#0041243) 4403 St. Clair Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44103 - 2 - SPELLACY, C.J.: Appeal dismissed for lack of a final, appealable order. The journal entry from which this appeal is taken does not bear the signature of the trial judge. The trial judge's signature was rubber-stamped on the journal entry. The journal entry later was signed by the administrative judge and time stamped after the term of the trial judge expired. This court previously has held that a rubber stamp used in lieu of a judge's signature is unacceptable pursuant to Civ.R. 58(A). In re Mitchell (1994), 93 Ohio App.3d 153. See also Brackmann Communications, Inc. v. Ritter (1987), 38 Ohio App.3d 107. It is unclear from the record if the trial judge prepared the final journal entries or00000 even saw the journal entries. The administrative judge's signature cannot cure the defect of the use of the rubber stamp. Another judge cannot render judgment if there are inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law rendered by the trial judge. See Vergon v. Vergon (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 639. As the judgment entry was not signed by the trial judge and does not comply with the dictates of Civ.R. 58(A), there is no final order before this court. Appeal dismissed. - 3 - It is ordered that appellee recover of appellant his costs herein taxed. The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal. It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the Juvenile Court Division to carry this judgment into execution. A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. JAMES M. PORTER, J. and TIMOTHY E. McMONAGLE, J. CONCUR. LEO M. SPELLACY CHIEF JUSTICE N.B. This is an announcement of the court's decision. See App.R. 22(B), 22(D) and 26(A); Loc.App.R. 27. This decision will be journalized and will become the judgment and order of the court pursuant to App.R. 22(B) unless a motion for reconsideration with supporting brief, per App.R. 26(A), is filed within ten (10) days of the announcement of the court's decision. The time period for review by the Supreme Court of Ohio shall begin to run upon the journalization of this court's announcement of decision by the .