COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 68846 STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. : DARIES SHERRILLS : : Relator : PETITION FOR WRIT OF : MANDAMUS -vs- : : STATE OF OHIO : : Respondent : : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT : MAY 12, 1995 OF DECISION : JUDGMENT : DISMISSED. DATE OF JOURNALIZATION : APPEARANCES: For relator: For respondent: DARIES SHERRILLS, PRO SE DIANE SMILANICK, ESQ. #206-377 (#0019987) Marion Correctional Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Institution The Justice Center P.O. Box 57 1200 Ontario Street Marion, OH 43302-0057 Cleveland, OH 44113 - 2 - PATTON, J. Daries Sherrills, relator, "pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act and Title 5, U.S.C. Section 552, 1974 and all relevant provisions," is seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the clerk of court to "turn over" various documents, including trial transcripts and all medical reports, police reports and journal entries in Case Nos. 21925, 22350, 46839, 167646, 211474, 211992, 230459 and 051882. Respondent moved to dismiss the petition and, for the following reasons, we grant respondent's motion. In order to withstand a Civ. R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss, a relator must allege in the petition "the existence of a legal duty by the respondent and the lack of an adequate remedy at law for the relator with sufficient particularity to put the respondent on notice of the substance of the claim(s) being asserted against it. . . ." State, ex rel. Boggs v. Springfield Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 94, 95. It must also appear that the relator might prove some set of facts which would warrant relief. Id. In this case, in addition to the vagueness in the caption of the petition concerning the identity of the respondent and the lack of an affidavit detailing relator's claims as required by Loc. App. R. 8, relator has failed to meet the above-stated basic substantive requirements for pleading his claim. Relator alleges in his petition the existence of a legal duty on the clerk of court, assuming the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Clerk of Court, pursuant to Section 552 of Title 5 of the - 3 - United States Code, Freedom of Information Act, to provide the requested information. That statute, however, confers no legal duty on respondent in any respect. Title 5, Section 552 of the United States Code, which governs the availability of public information of governmental agencies, is applicable only to the specified authorities of the government of the United States. See 5 U.S.C. Sections 551-552. Since respondent is not a federal agency as defined in the Act, respondent has no legal duty pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552 to "turn over" documents. Even if respondent were a federal entity subject to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, enforcement of the Act is limited to the federal district courts. 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552(a)(4)(B). Accordingly, the motion to dismiss of respondent for failure to state a claim is granted. Case dismissed. Relator to pay costs. JAMES D. SWEENEY, J. JOSEPH NAHRA, J., CONCUR. JOHN T. PATTON CHIEF JUSTICE .