COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 68245 STATE OF OHIO, : : ACCELERATED DOCKET : Plaintiff-Appellee : JOURNAL ENTRY : v. : AND : MICHAEL LOCKWOOD, : OPINION : : PER CURIAM Defendant-Appellant : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION: JULY 20, 1995 CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Criminal appeal from Common Pleas Court Case No. CR-311249 JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED. DATE OF JOURNALIZATION: APPEARANCES: For plaintiff-appellee: Blaise D. Thomas Assistant County Prosecutor The Justice Center - 8th Floor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 For defendant-appellant: George W. MacDonald 848 Rockefeller Building Cleveland, Ohio 44113 -2- PER CURIAM: Appellant's assignment of error is overruled. The officers had a reasonable suspicion appellant was involved in drug activity based on information provided by a confidential, reliable informant, and corroboration of the informant's information. See Adams v. Williams (1972), 407 U.S. 143, 92 S.Ct. 1921, 32 L.Ed.2d 612, Alabama v. White (1990), 496 U.S. 325, 110 S.Ct. 2412, 110 L.Ed.2d 301. The police were justified in making an investigative Terry stop. Id., Terry v. Ohio (1968), 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889. The police had a reasonable belief appellant could be armed, so a pat down search was justified. Terry, supra. Detective Charchenko could seize the lumps of cocaine he felt in appellant's pocket during the pat down search, because it was immediately apparent through Charchenko's sense of touch that the object was cocaine. Minnesota v. Dickerson (1993), 113 S.Ct. 2130, 124 L.Ed.2d 334. Appellant's fourth amendment rights were not violated. Judgment affirmed. -3- It is ordered that appellee recover of appellant its costs herein taxed. The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal. It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the Common Pleas Court to carry this judgment into execution. The defendant's conviction having been affirmed, any bail pending appeal is terminated. Case remanded to the trial court for execution of sentence. A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. ANN DYKE, PRESIDING JUDGE JOSEPH J. NAHRA, JUDGE DIANE KARPINSKI, JUDGE N.B. This entry is made pursuant to the third sentence of Rule 22(D), Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure. This is an announcement of decision (see Rule 26). Ten (10) days from the date hereof this document will be stamped to indicate journalization, at which time .