COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 61151 : EDGARD A. COLON : : JOURNAL ENTRY Plaintiff-Appellee : : and -vs- : : OPINION : SAFE SYSTEMS, INC. DBA RAMZE : : Defendant-Appellant : : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT NOVEMBER 12, 1992 OF DECISION: CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Civil appeal from Parma Municipal Court Case No. 90-CVI-1847 JUDGMENT: Dismissed. DATE OF JOURNALIZATION: __________________________ APPEARANCES: FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE: FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT: EDGARD A. COLON, pro se CHRISTI C. FARHAT, President 3341 West 123rd Street Safe Systems, Inc., dba Ramze Cleveland, Ohio 44111 8812 Orchard Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44144 -2- PATRICIA A. BLACKMON, J.: This appeal is from a judgment of the Parma Municipal Court against Safe Systems, Inc. dba, Ramze defendant-appellant, hereinafter the Corporation in favor of Edgard A. Colon plaintiff-appellee, hereinafter Colon in the amount of $481.45 for damages to Colon's automobile allegedly caused by the Corporation's employees. For the reasons set forth below, this appeal is dismissed. The record of this appeal establishes that Christi C. Farhat, President of the Corporation, submitted and signed the brief for the Corporation and appeared at the oral argument for the Corporation on September 15, 1992. At the oral argument, Christi C. Farhat acknowledged that she is not admitted to the practice of law in the State of Ohio and is not an attorney. Thus, the question is whether the Corporation may appear in propria persona in this appeal through an officer of the Corporation who is not a licensed attorney? The law in Ohio is that a corporation cannot maintain litigation or appear in court through an officer of the corporation or an appointed agent not admitted to the practice of law. A corporation is not in all respects a natural person; therefore, it may not represent itself in propria persona through an appropriated agent who is not a licensed attorney. Union Savings Assn. v. Home Owners Aid, Inc. (1970), 23 Ohio St.2d 60. (Held that R.C. 4705.01, which prohibits the practice of law by those not admitted to the bar, applies to officer's -3- representation of their corporation). See also, Palmer v. Westmeyer (1988), 48 Ohio App.3d 296. To allow a corporation to maintain litiga- tion and appear in court represented by corporate officers or agents only would lay open the gates to the practice of law for entry to those corporate officers or agents who have not been qualified to practice law and who are not amenable to the general discipline of the court. Union Savings Assn. at 64. Consequently, the Corporation cannot maintain an appeal through the representation of Ms. Farhat as its president. Appeal dismissed. -4- It is ordered that Appellee recover of Appellant his costs herein taxed. A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Exceptions. FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, P.J., and KRUPANSKY, J., CONCUR. PATRICIA A. BLACKMON JUDGE N.B. This entry is made pursuant to the third sentence of Rule 22(D), Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure. This is an announcement of decision (see Rule 26). Ten (10) days from the date hereof this document will be stamped to indicate journaliza- tion, at which time it will become the judgment and order of the court and time period for review will begin to run. .