COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 61028 IN RE: ELISE SCHLESINGER, : A MINOR : : JOURNAL ENTRY Plaintiff-Appellant : : and -vs- : : OPINION : Defendant-Appellee : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION: MAY 7, 1992 CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: CIVIL APPEAL FROM THE JUVENILE COURT DIVISION CASE NO. 9100501 JUDGMENT: APPEAL DISMISSED DATE OF JOURNALIZATION: __________________________ APPEARANCES: For plaintiff-appellant: HYMAN FRIEDMAN CUYAHOGA COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER BY: ROBERT M. INGERSOLL ASSISTANT PUBLIC DEFENDER THE MARION BUILDING, ROOM 307 1276 WEST THIRD STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44113-1569 For defendant-appellee, Department of Human Services: CARL LoPRESTI 3955 EUCLID AVENUE CLEVELAND, OHIO 44115 For Guardian ad litem, for Elise Schlesinger: FRANK D. AQUILA 5086 LANSDOWNE DRIVE SOLON, OH 44139 For Mary Schlesinger: GREGORY T. STRALKA 400 STANDARD BUILDING CLEVELAND, OHIO 44113 - 2 - SPELLACY, P.J.: Appellant Robert Schlesinger ("appellant") appeals from the Juvenile Court's decision adjudging his daughter, Elise Schlesinger, born March 2, 1974, to be a dependent child and ordering that she be committed to the temporary custody of appellee Cuyahoga County Department of Human Services. Appellant raises the following assignments of error: I. THE TRIAL COURT DENIED ROBERT SCHLESINGER HIS RIGHT TO COUNSEL AND TO A FULL AND FAIR HEARING ON THE QUESTION OF CUSTODY OF HIS DAUGHTER WHEN IT PROCEEDED TO A DISPOSITIONAL HEARING IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE ADJUDICATORY HEARING. II. ROBERT SCHLESINGER WAS DENIED A FAIR HEARING BY THE REPEATED INTRODUCTION OF PREJUDICIAL HEARSAY EVIDENCE AGAINST HIM. III. ROBERT SCHLESINGER WAS DENIED HIS RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHEN THE TRIAL COURT PROCEEDED WITH BOTH THE ADJUDICATORY AND THE DISPOSITIONAL HEARINGS IN THE CASE AT BAR AT A TIME WHEN MR. SCHLESINGER'S APPOINTED COUNSEL WAS IN ANOTHER COURT AND COULD NOT ATTEND. We address appellant's assignments of error together. Elise Schlesinger is now eighteen years of age. As a result, the Juvenile Court has lost jurisdiction over her. R.C. 2151.353(E)(1). The issues raised in this appeal, therefore, are moot. Tschantz v. Ferguson (1991), 57 Ohio St. 3d 131, 133; Miner v. Witt (1910), 82 Ohio St. 237, 237-239; In the Matter of: Denise Gerkin (November 9, 1990), Wood App. No. 19990, unreported. Appellate court's have no authority to review issues which have become moot. State v. Berndt (1987), 29 Ohio St. 3d 3, syllabus. Appeal dismissed. - 3 - It is ordered that appellee recover of appellant their costs herein taxed. The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal. It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the Juvenile Court to carry this judgment into execution. A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. HARPER, J., AND MARTIN, J.*, CONCUR (*William J. Martin, of the Carroll County Common Pleas Court, Sitting by Assignment) LEO M. SPELLACY PRESIDING JUDGE N.B. This entry is made pursuant to the third sentence of Rule 22(D), Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure. This is an announcement of decision (see Rule 26). Ten (10) days from the date hereof this document will be stamped to indicate journalization, at which time it will become the judgment and order of the court and time period for review will begin to run. .