COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 61024 CITY OF CLEVELAND : : : PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE : JOURNAL ENTRY : v. : AND : NICHOLAS LAURIANTI : OPINION : : DEFENDANT-APPELLANT : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION: August 13, 1992 CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM THE CLEVELAND MUNICIPAL COURT CASE NO. 90 TRD 9705 JUDGMENT: APPEAL DISMISSED. DATE OF JOURNALIZATION: APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff-Appellee: MARK A. McCLAIN CHIEF PROSECUTING ATTORNEY BY: EDWARD T. BUELOW (#0022710) ASSISTANT CITY PROSECUTOR JUSTICE CENTER - 8TH FLOOR 1200 ONTARIO STREET CLEVELAND, OHIO 44113 For Defendant-Appellant: JOHN B. GIBBONS 2000 STANDARD BUILDING 1370 ONTARIO STREET CLEVELAND, OHIO 44113 -2- SPELLACY, J.: Defendant-appellant Nicholas Laurianti appeals his conviction for failing to comply with a lawful police order (Cleveland Codified Ordinances Section 403.02(a)). We find the appeal to be moot and dismiss it. The record contains a receipt showing that Laurianti paid the fifty dollar fine imposed by the trial court. The voluntary payment of a fine, when the fine is the sole sanction imposed, renders an appeal moot unless the defendant shows that he or she will suffer some collateral disability or loss of civil rights as the result of the judgment or conviction. State v. Berndt (1987), 29 Ohio St. 3d 3, 4; see, also, State v. Bazen (1988), 37 Ohio St. 3d 242; State v. Wilson (1975), 41 Ohio St. 2d 236. A review of the record reveals that Laurianti has offered no evidence showing that he will suffer any collateral disability or loss of civil rights as the result of his conviction. We find, therefore, that the appeal is moot. Appeal dismissed. -3- It is ordered that appellee recover of appellant its costs herein taxed. The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal. It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the Cleveland Municipal Court to carry this judgment into execution. A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. JOHN F. CORRIGAN, P.J., AND HARPER, J., CONCUR LEO M. SPELLACY JUDGE N.B. This entry is made pursuant to the third sentence of Rule 22(D), Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure. This is an announcement of decision (see Rule 26). Ten (10) days from the date hereof this document will be stamped to indicate journalization, at which time it will become the judgment and order of the court and time period for review will begin to run. .