Subj : Re: "Hams to the Rescue After Katrina" MSNBC News Article
To   : alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.dx,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy
From : Tom Donaly
Date : Wed Oct 05 2005 04:49:03

From Newsgroup: alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf

Amos Keag wrote:
> Richard Clark wrote:
> 
> SNIPPED
> 
>> Seems you've drawn a blank then too.  On your own sentence which is
>> the point I made significant.  That you missed on both accounts is
>> doubly indicting.  Do you have a relative in Texas that is sweating
>> bullets now?
> 
> 
> Richard, Richard, Richard!  :-(     Read your last sentence. Do you see 
> the error??
> 
> "Do you have a relative in Texas that is sweating bullets now?"
> 
> There is a GLARING ERROR in it!!!!!  It should be ...
> "Do you have a relative in Texas WHO is sweating bullets now?"
> 
> A relative is a PERSON not a THING: a WHO not a THAT!!
> 
> Tch, Tch,
> 

Not if the who is a that. Consider yourself insulted.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH

.