Subj : Re: "Hams to the Rescue After Katrina" MSNBC News Article
To   : alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.dx,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy
From : Richard Clark
Date : Sat Sep 24 2005 11:29:49

From Newsgroup: alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf

On 24 Sep 2005 07:36:42 -0700, N2EY@AOL.COM wrote:
>http://tinyurl.com/cd6h6
>73 de Jim, N2EY

Hi Jim,

Thanx, and a tip of the hat for directing me to the authority in logic
with regard to arguing who's an atheist (re: current correspondence)
that is so aptly aped at your link with:

>FRANCIS:
>    Why are you always on about women, Stan?
>STAN:
>    I want to be one.
>REG:
>    What?
>STAN:
>    I want to be a woman. From now on, I want you all to call me 'Loretta'.
>REG:
>    What?!
>LORETTA:
>    It's my right as a man.
>JUDITH:
>    Well, why do you want to be Loretta, Stan?
>LORETTA:
>    I want to have babies.
>REG:
>    You want to have babies?!
>LORETTA:
>    It's every man's right to have babies if he wants them.
>REG:
>    But... you can't have babies.
>LORETTA:
>    Don't you oppress me.
>REG:
>    I'm not oppressing you, Stan. You haven't got a womb! 
>   Where's the foetus going to gestate?! You going to keep it in a box?!
>LORETTA:
>    [crying]
>JUDITH:
>    Here! I-- I've got an idea. Suppose you agree that he can't actually have babies, 
>   not having a womb, which is nobody's fault, not even the Romans',
>   but that he can have the right to have babies.
>FRANCIS:
>    Good idea, Judith. We shall fight the oppressors for your right to have babies, brother. Sister. Sorry.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

.