Subj : Re: TNG vs TOS - anybody still think Next Generation sucks?
To   : rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.startrek.current,alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From : ANIM8Rfsk
Date : Fri Sep 30 2005 22:06:32

From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos

in article Xns96E1C4564D403Knights.of.our.times@216.196.97.142, PzKfw Bob at
my2cents@worth.ca wrote on 9/30/05 4:18 PM:

> "Marcovaldo" <Marcovaldo@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
> news:Kpi%e.95825$qY1.42252@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
> 
>> "Brian Henderson" <BrianL.Henderson@NOSPAM.verizon.net> wrote in
>> message news:nkvqj11hq7uaja87pdeh1nemsakgrrh5nj@4ax.com...
>>> On 29 Sep 2005 05:21:39 -0700, electrictroy@gmail.com wrote:
>>> 
>>> And let's not
>>> forget Wesley Crusher, boy deity.
>> 
>> No, LET'S forget Wesley Crusher.
>> 
>> 
> 
> Actually I had forgotten him, now the bile is rising again at the
> thought of that little puke, if Picard had any, he would have spaced
> him. That little puke was what totally convinced me of the shows' lack
> of merit. 
> 
> ....and speaking of techo crap, any Holodeck related ep of any Trek just
> shows that they couldn't write shows worth shit. (if I wanted to watch
> Sherlock Holmes I'd watch it on PBS)  That Holodeck is so bogus and even
> if it was possible, I doubt if you could air the eps about what would
> really goes on in a holodeck because of the X rating.
> 
> 
> 
It seemed pretty obvious that that's what was going on in Quark's
holosuites.

-- 

You Can't Stop the Signal

.