Subj : Re: LOL... YES! To : alt.tv.star-trek.tos,alt.startrek From : Louis M. Brown Date : Tue Sep 20 2005 10:17:24 From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 01:13:21 -0400, ToolPackinMama wrote: >Wouter Valentijn wrote: >> VernonT wrote: >> >>>"CaptainPike" wrote in message >>>news:11irk5k58dsdcba@corp.supernews.com... >>> >>>>Furthermore, he has generally demonstrated a complete absence of >>>>innate leadership capability. Guy's an obvious, apparent, errant >>>>moron. Bush fails to show any signs of even average intelligence. > >Ah, yes, that was me, FWIW. > >>>However, iminently? > >Huh? Is iminently even a word? What, nobody is allowed to fuck up spelling a word? > What does such a word mean in the >context cited above? Anyone? Come on now, stop fronting, you know what he meant. > >>> more intelligent than you appear to be. > >Well, at least I know enough to start a sentance with a capital letter. > I learned that in grade school. Pity that you can't spell SENTENCE. > >>>Some scientists on Star Trek are pretty dumb compared to >>>others but all of them can read a script and appear smarter >>>than any of us. > >So? Bush is still a shamefully obvious moron. Can't argue with that, and I won't. > >> Actors you mean. >> The scientists are characters they play. > >Correct. > >BTW: > >http://www.armchairsubversive.com/ > >http://www.redmorals.com/ > >So... Kirk/Spock in '08! Seriously! :) Prolly not... but no less ludicrious than the morons we'll be presented with. -LMB .