Subj : Re: Rumor thread To : alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise From : Anybody Date : Wed Sep 21 2005 17:18:25 From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise In article <2jk1j1hg09fp9s6s4lub7vienn5pkov0fl@4ax.com>, The Merry Piper wrote: > On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:58:44 +1200, Anybody > wrote: > > >In article , > >Wandering Wastrel wrote: > > > >> In article <1BNXe.15521$mH.24@fed1read07>, aevansjr3@cox.net says... > >> > I dunno I read in sci-fi mag as well thier was a small hint it may come > >> > back. I wish sci-fi channel would buy it and add it to thiier excellent > >> > friday line up! > >> > >> If they would reimagine it the way they did BSG -- start over, get a new > >> cast, leave out the Suliban/Future Guy time-traveling crap (and the > >> idiotic Xindi arc) -- I'd watch. But if they just took up where they left > >> off -- season four improvements notwithstanding -- why bother? > > > >Good God, NO! That was the entire basic problem with Enterprise, it WAS > >the "re-imagining" of Star Trek. Beavis & Butthead were originally > >trying to make a Star Trek that would also appeal to those who wouldn't > >normall watch a "Trek" show - that's why it wasn't originally called > >"Star Trek: Enterprise". > > TNG was re-imagining of "Star Trek" and it did just fine. Nope. TNG was a "continuation" / "sequel" and was basically the same as TOS. It just had a different crew and a newer ship, but the style, etc. was the same and not buggered up beyond recognition. :-) .