Subj : Today's Thought
To   : Newborn
From : George Pope
Date : Mon Oct 10 2005 18:26:00

N>  > He interpreted the dictates differently, per older teachings, as the
N>  > Conservative rabbis do today.
N>  >
N>
N>    And you a basing this on what?  The Talumd?  The teaching of the Rabbis?
N>    None of this is part of the Torah. but the opinion of man.

The Torah contains more than the written books of Moses, as Moses himself
testified ("as was shown to me..." etc.)
and when it says he brought down BOTH the Torah and the Mishnah("instructions
concerning the Torah") from Sinai.

N>  > N>    Besides to be a Pharaisee one had to be married according to Jewish
N>  > N>    tradition (i.e. Paul).
N>  >
N>  > But Paul wasn't married & made a pointof saying he never would be.
N>  >
N>    There is indication of Paul having been previouysly married when he was
N>    a Pharaises.  It was only later, possibly when he was widowed, that he
N>    said this.
N>
N>  > And there's been some debate as to whether Jesus was married or not. . .
N>  >
N>
N>    This heresy has been around since the 2nd centruy and was developed
N>    only after some 200 yrs of theologoical witness of the Apostles and
N>    and Father's to the truth.  It is pure fabrication, based upon the
N>    lies of human writings.

There's more evidence in the Xian Bible that Jesus was married than that Paul
was!

Jesus, at least, was at a wedding ceremony, and travelled/cohabitted with a
woman exclusively of all others.

Paul isn't mentioned in the company of any woman (except a married one who
taught him the Gospel) and certainly never at any wedding rituals. . .

Because I care,
|<+]::-)  (Cyberpope(the Bishop of ROM!))


.... nfx v3.1                                                                 

---
 þ Synchronet þ The Thunderbolt BBS - tbolt.synchro.net - (501) 223-2541

.