Subj : Re: BSG To : alt.tv.farscape From : John I Date : Tue Sep 27 2005 20:05:25 From Newsgroup: alt.tv.farscape Jim Larson wrote: > Nick wrote: > >> Jim Larson wrote: >> >>> Nick wrote: >>> >>>> Tyler Trafford wrote: >>>> >>>>> Nick wrote: >>>>>> John I wrote: >>>>>>> Nick wrote: >>>>>>>> TNW7Z7Z7Z12345 wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Be sure to read the URL John posted. http://tinyurl.com/8ko7r. >>>>>>>>> It is now obvious that this goes way beyond Abu Graib - that it >>>>>>>>> was widespread and that the military is still trying to cover >>>>>>>>> it up. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A lot of that is really bad but some of these things I look at >>>>>>>> and think, so what? For example: "Detainees were also stacked, >>>>>>>> fully clothed, in human pyramids and forced to hold five-gallon >>>>>>>> water jugs with arms outstretched or do jumping jacks until they >>>>>>>> passed out, the report says." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This stuff looks like really mild fraternity initiation rituals >>>>>>>> or even high-school football practice. >>>>>>>> Breaking bones and beatings are one thing, but this other stuff >>>>>>>> is laughable. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Trun off Rush radio. It is a proven fact that it will actually >>>>>>> make you dumber. >>>>>> >>>>>> So you have been listening to it, eh? >>>>>> >>>>>> Actually, I don't listen to political radio. >>>>>> But I did go to catholic school and military basic training and >>>>>> have had to do similar things to these. >>>>> >>>>> I'm pretty sure this wasn't training or trust exercises. >>>> >>>> >>>> Neither was mine. Holding items with your arms out was standard >>>> school punishment. >>>> >>> >>> In a highly controlled situation, where you knew on some instinctual >>> level that there was oversight and that it would never go too far. I >>> strongly doubt that you ever feared Sr. Mary Frances would break your >>> wrists if you dropped the books you were holding. >> >> >> True, but we are comparing elementary school kids to terrorists and >> insurgents. I would expect the treatment to be a little tougher than >> it is on the kids. > > Only if those being treated tougher are actual terrorists and insurgents > rather than just random brown-skinned people. Guantanamo may be a > different situation. In Iraq, however, I would bet that a sizeable > percentage of those arrested just had the misfortune of being picked up > for some reason. > > But this is beside the point. What are we doing there? Are we trying to > foster democracy, or are we an occupying army free to ignore our own > laws and sense of decency when it's convenient? If you were a random > Iraqi whose relative, terrorist or not, had just had his legs broken by > the nice Marine Sergeant over there, what would your gut reaction to > this question be? > I thought we were there because Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and they were getting ready to attack the US. .