Subj : Re: Didn't everyone know Britney would have to have a C-section because of those skinny hips of hers?
To   : alt.fan.britney-spears,alt.gossip.celebrities,alt.showbiz.gossip,alt.music.pink-floyd,alt.tv.farscape
From : sincerequestioner
Date : Mon Sep 26 2005 15:25:45

From Newsgroup: alt.tv.farscape

I didn't make mention of it on the original post Doomella, but she DOES
have a NARROW isthmus as well as those narrow hips.  Boy I bet that is
some good stuff!  And that is a big reason I envy Kevin.  It sure isn't
because of that "nickel" rap of his.

SincereQuestioner

Doomella's conjecture on a followup to Buttercup who was following up
mslindac:
**********************************************************************
This isn't anything new. For years, a lot of "society" and "executive"
women
have scheduled C-sections (performed at a supposedly reasonable time in

their pregnancy) so they can plan ahead and know that they can attend
that
board meeting at noon on Tuesday the 12th instead. This has been going
on
for quite some time, sterile as it may seem.

As for the "breeder's hips" stuff, that's nonsense. For one thing,
Britney
doesn't have unusually narrow hips. And it's not the width of the hips
but
the width of the pelvis that determines whether or not a newborn can
slither
out without requiring a C-section. You can have very narrow hips with
pelvic
bones that can easily accomodate a baby's passage, or very wide hips
and 
small pelvic bones that won't.

.