Subj : Re: Didn't everyone know Britney would have to have a C-section because of those skinny hips of hers? To : alt.fan.britney-spears,alt.gossip.celebrities,alt.showbiz.gossip,alt.music.pink-floyd,alt.tv.farscape From : doomella Date : Sun Sep 25 2005 22:47:21 From Newsgroup: alt.tv.farscape "Buttercup" wrote in message news:1127683980.153706.284880@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > mslindac > > I'll bet dollars to donuts that the c-section was because of work > > schedule. > > > *What* work? <<<<<<<<<<< > > Her world is supposed to be *Chaotic*. > I just ASSumed is was because of work. This isn't anything new. For years, a lot of "society" and "executive" women have scheduled C-sections (performed at a supposedly reasonable time in their pregnancy) so they can plan ahead and know that they can attend that board meeting at noon on Tuesday the 12th instead. This has been going on for quite some time, sterile as it may seem. As for the "breeder's hips" stuff, that's nonsense. For one thing, Britney doesn't have unusually narrow hips. And it's not the width of the hips but the width of the pelvis that determines whether or not a newborn can slither out without requiring a C-section. You can have very narrow hips with pelvic bones that can easily accomodate a baby's passage, or very wide hips and small pelvic bones that won't. .