Subj : Re: ah, college newspapers... To : alt.tv.farscape From : Nick Date : Wed Sep 21 2005 01:31:52 From Newsgroup: alt.tv.farscape weirdwolf wrote: > Nick wrote in > news:Xns96D7C2C941BFDndtcm@ 68.1.17.6: > >> weirdwolf wrote: >> >>> Nick wrote in >>> news:Xns96D7C1922B5BFndtcm@ 68.1.17.6: >>> >>>> John Iwaniszek wrote: >>>> >>>>> Nick wrote in >>>>> news:Xns96D7B3E543115ndtcm@68.1.17.6: >>>>> >>>>>> John Iwaniszek wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Nick wrote in >>>>>>> news:Xns96D7A6E1B51CAndtcm@ 68.1.17.6: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tyler Trafford wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> John I wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Tyler Trafford wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Tyler Trafford wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> John I wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Tyler Trafford wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/cgpu3 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It's abotu that anne coulter wanna-be at UNC, isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>> it? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Oh: >>>>>>>>>>>> http://rdu.news14.com/content/headlines/?ArID=74527 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> While a weird thing to write (as she phrased it), it >>>>>>>>>>> doesn't sound like she should have been fired for >>>>>>>>>>> bringing it up. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> They got her because she manipulated and distorted the >>>>>>>>>> interviews. It's a journalistic ethics thing. And now >>>>>>>>>> she gets to go on the talk show circuit and whine about >>>>>>>>>> how liberal academics discriminate against racist 'winger >>>>>>>>>> bitches. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Oh, okay. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They got her because it was the politically correct thing >>>>>>>> to do. Journalists don't have ethics. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's a mystery to me how things became so inverted. >>>>>>> Somehow, I am supposed to be ashamed that I deplore vicious >>>>>>> race baiting like the sill 'winger bitch was doing because >>>>>>> and if I speak out against it the litle twit can can claim >>>>>>> that I am persecuting her. She's a racist bitch, for god's >>>>>>> sake! She should be persecuted! She's bad. There's nothing >>>>>>> good about race baiting. And when you throw in the fact that >>>>>>> she lied and distorted the interviews to support her twisted >>>>>>> point of view, there is no way she can be redeemed. She is >>>>>>> poison. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does she have a right to hold those points of view? hell >>>>>>> yes. Doe she have a right to avoid the consequences of her >>>>>>> anti-social lip? hell no! She made her bed, now she has to >>>>>>> sleep in it. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> From what I can see in the other Op-Ed piece in her school >>>>>> paper she didn't lie at all. I like the way you find it >>>>>> necessary to tack "bitch" onto every description of her. I >>>>>> think she is just a kid who wrote a column hoping to get a >>>>>> reaction out of people. Did you see her anti-greek column >>>>>> where she referred to the "sorroristutes"? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> She's a supid ;winger bitch who wrote some very unnecessary >>>>> and cruel rascist tripe. Why you are defending her, I don't >>>>> know. She's bad, dishonest, cruel, and a racist and for those >>>>> reasons she doesn't deserve a position on the school newspaper >>>>> and she doesn't deserve a place in my tax-funded university. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Arabic is not a race. >>> >>> Neither is Jewish, or Christian. Would you find it ok if I >>> suggested that the pope should have an anal cavity search when >>> he goes through and airport? I mean the last one must have been >>> used to it, he assumed the position every time. >>> Ted >>> >> >> Ok, by me. >> > > Well, maybe that was a bad choice I mean the current one is a > German. > Ted > Actually, the pope is one specific person so it isn't really a good comparison. I think there is a lot of wiggle room between pure profiling and the totally random checks that they currently make. For example, I would assess a woman with a baby as an especially low risk on an airplane flight. Unless you count the baby as a psychological terrorist. .