Subj : Re: Larry King To : alt.tv.farscape From : weirdwolf Date : Thu Sep 01 2005 00:24:17 From Newsgroup: alt.tv.farscape John Iwaniszek wrote in news:Xns96C3C0A432687joiwhnanri@66.26.32.9: > weirdwolf wrote in > news:Xns96C3F2A77A5Er73u67jw56nas@80.5.182.99: > >> John Iwaniszek wrote in >> news:Xns96C3BF19CC368joiwhnanri@66.26.32.9: >> >>> weirdwolf wrote in >>> news:Xns96C3E488061D5r73u67jw56nas@80.5.182.99: >>> >>>> Tyler Trafford wrote in >>>> news:3nmla3F2a6dfU2@individual.net: >>>> >>>>> weirdwolf wrote: >>>>>> Tyler Trafford wrote in >>>>>> news:3nmkgoF2a1tqU1 @individual.net: >>>>>> >>>>>>> weirdwolf wrote: >>>>>>>> Steve Brooks wrote: >>>>>>>>> weirdwolf wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Which should lead to the development of brown field innercity >>>>>>>>>> sites and the development of better mass transportation. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why should there be any move towards better mass transportation >>>>>>>>> when petrol is a mere $4/gallon? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm an advocate of increasing fuel prices to the consumer, might >>>>>>>> stop people driving the 15 minute walk to the shop. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wouldn't that just increase cost-of-living and just cause >>>>>>> inflation? >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes and no. Prices would increase as a result of increased >>>>>> transportation costs, but you could offset that by other means. >>>>>> The cost of living due to spiralling petrol prices is happening >>>>>> anyway, were are talking about the same sort of prices for oil as >>>>>> after the Iranian revolution. It will continue to rise no matter >>>>>> what, instabilities in the middle east and elsewhere, the North >>>>>> sea reserves are draining rapidly, the scarcity of easily >>>>>> accesable reserves mean that unless you switch to an alternative >>>>>> source of power that stuff like tar sands will have to be >>>>>> exploited. More difficult to extract and to actually get to, with >>>>>> a corresponding price increase. A lot of the goods in this country >>>>>> used to be transported by rail I'ld like to see this return. >>>>> >>>>> What gets me is how the price increases are due not to supply >>>>> shortfalls, but by the threat of possible future shortfalls. >>>> >>>> No, supply shortfalls are happening now, there is just not enough >>>> refining capability to produce the right fractions required. China >>>> has a huge requirement which is getting larger every day. This is >>>> what peak oil is all about. Wether we've reached it yet or not I am >>>> uncertain, lets face it I am way to stupid to understand this kind >>>> of thing, but all the data doesn't look good. >>>> >>> >>> Demand is presently exceeding supply. Or is that merely stating the >>> obvious? >>> >> >> It's more than that, it's that the supply has reached is maximum >> possible level and that this downturn in supply is coupled with a >> still increasing demand. >> > > I know what peak oil is. I was describing the current situation: > Pumping capacity is less than current demand. > My point is that, yes capacity has exceeded demand, but it has done for a while but that isn't the whole story, hence the comment about peak oil. In a well balanced system demand will always exceed supply. Ted -- Stare too long into the abyss and the abyss looks like a nifty place to hide the bodies .